[Bug target/43703] Unexpected floating point precision loss due to ARM NEON autovectorization

2010-06-16 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-16 11:41 --- I am working on this. -- jules at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/44291] [4.6 regression] ICE in set_user_assembler_libfunc

2010-05-27 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-27 10:44 --- Created an attachment (id=20760) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20760&action=view) The test case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44291

[Bug middle-end/44291] New: [4.6 regression] ICE in set_user_assembler_libfunc

2010-05-27 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
ponent: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jules at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44291

[Bug bootstrap/39929] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrapping fails at stage 1 on powerpc-ibm-aix

2009-05-05 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 16:07 --- This still seems to be broken as of r147126 for ARM Linux. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39929

[Bug bootstrap/39929] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrapping fails at stage 1 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and powerpc-ibm-aix

2009-04-28 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 22:31 --- FYI: the above patch seems to have caused ARM Linux (cross) builds to break, e.g.: /scratch/julian/arm-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/libgcc/../gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c:589: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

[Bug target/38697] gcc.target/arm/neon/neon.exp tests for vmov fail on arm-linux-eabi

2009-03-11 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-11 20:47 --- These failures show up because the tests are kind of weak. There's no particular reason that vget_low* intrinsics should generate vmov instructions as the tests are expecting: the assembly output shown with vldr

[Bug target/35965] -fstack-protector produces segfaulting binaries on arm/armel

2008-06-26 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-26 10:10 --- I've posted a candidate fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg01641.html -- jules at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |

[Bug middle-end/35964] ICE with -funroll-loops on arm/arm eabi

2008-05-12 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 15:27 --- I think this was probably fixed by one of Andrew Jenner's patches in gfortran-armel-updates: http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2008/04/msg00351.html (The "Unshare RTX earlier..." one). Andrew and

[Bug testsuite/25590] [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1

2006-01-23 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 17:45 --- Subject: Bug 25590 Author: jules Date: Mon Jan 23 17:45:08 2006 New Revision: 110134 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110134 Log: Backport from mainline. 2006-01-23 Kaz

[Bug testsuite/25590] [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1

2006-01-23 Thread jules at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jules at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 17:42 --- Subject: Bug 25590 Author: jules Date: Mon Jan 23 17:42:38 2006 New Revision: 110133 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110133 Log: Backport from mainline. 2006-01-23 Kaz