https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104798
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Stein ---
Last update on this for today from me: If there is a difference between "type
of" the operator and the operator itself language wise, then there's a
different but related regression that appears to break st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104798
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Stein ---
Further, after some back and forth with a colleague, I don't know if this is an
extension or not. I'm not too clear on the language, but from the C++20
published draft n4849:
> An attribute-specifier-seq i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104798
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Stein ---
Possibly related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90333
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104798
Bug ID: 104798
Summary: Regression: [[gnu::always_inline]] ignored on lambda,
no warning emitted
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
