[Bug c++/109963] New: ABI: unexpected layout ordering of `this` pointer in lambda capture

2023-05-25 Thread joker.eph at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: joker.eph at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- See the discussion here: https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/141 Most recent post at the moment was calling out a

[Bug middle-end/60235] Inlining fails with template specialization and -fPIC on Linux AMD64

2014-02-17 Thread joker.eph at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60235 --- Comment #7 from Mehdi Amini --- Yeah I can declare it inline, indeed I already did, I was just considering it a workaround for a "missing compiler optimization" ;-)

[Bug middle-end/60235] Inlining fails with template specialization and -fPIC on Linux AMD64

2014-02-17 Thread joker.eph at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60235 --- Comment #5 from Mehdi Amini --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > The specialization is a regular function, not comdat, thus it is not > appropriate to inline it at -O2 -fpic, only -O3 is inlining functions > regardless to whether

[Bug middle-end/60235] New: Inlining fails with template specialization and -fPIC on Linux AMD64

2014-02-16 Thread joker.eph at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: joker.eph at gmail dot com Tested with g++-4.6, g++4.8 and current svn: $ ./gcc-svn-install/bin/g++ --version g++ (GCC) 4.9.0 20140217 (experimental) I have a simple C++ code

[Bug middle-end/60235] Inlining fails with template specialization and -fPIC on Linux AMD64

2014-02-16 Thread joker.eph at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60235 --- Comment #1 from Mehdi Amini --- Created attachment 32149 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32149&action=edit Test Case