[Bug c++/47488] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

2013-11-05 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488 Jeremiah Willcock changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jewillco at osl dot iu.edu

[Bug middle-end/57529] New: Redundant masking of zero-extended values

2013-06-04 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jewillco at osl dot iu.edu Using version "gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20130519 (experimental)" with target "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" and the flags "-Ofast -std=gnu99 -march=bdver1", the following co

[Bug c++/57528] New: Missed warning for putting reference to temporary in class member

2013-06-04 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jewillco at osl dot iu.edu It would be nice to have a warning on code such as: struct b { const int& r; b(int r): r(r) {} }; that is almost certainly unintended since it al

[Bug tree-optimization/57380] GCC 4.9.0 will not vectorize std::max and similar functions

2013-05-22 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57380 --- Comment #1 from Jeremiah Willcock --- I tested version "(Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3" and that fails as well (with "note: not vectorized: data ref analysis failed D.2097_9 = *D.2115_16;" in the vectorization report).

[Bug tree-optimization/57380] New: GCC 4.9.0 will not vectorize std::max and similar functions

2013-05-22 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jewillco at osl dot iu.edu It appears that having a function that returns a const reference to one of its arguments causes vectorization of calls to that function to fail. Here is

[Bug c++/53845] Another "error reporting routines re-entered" issue

2012-10-04 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845 --- Comment #4 from Jeremiah Willcock 2012-10-04 15:43:30 UTC --- I don't know whether it is valid or not after all of the trimming I did on it.

[Bug c++/54379] New: Suggestion for type attribute similar to warn_unused_result

2012-08-26 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54379 Bug #: 54379 Summary: Suggestion for type attribute similar to warn_unused_result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53845] New: Another "error reporting routines re-entered" issue

2012-07-03 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53845 Bug #: 53845 Summary: Another "error reporting routines re-entered" issue Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/52859] New: ICE ("Error reporting routines re-entered") on highly recursive template code

2012-04-03 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52859 Bug #: 52859 Summary: ICE ("Error reporting routines re-entered") on highly recursive template code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: U

[Bug c++/52816] New: Access to private members inside decltype in the signature of a member template causes access control error

2012-04-01 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816 Bug #: 52816 Summary: Access to private members inside decltype in the signature of a member template causes access control error Classification: Unclassified Product: g

[Bug libstdc++/50159] New: tuple_cat only accepts two arguments

2011-08-22 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50159 Bug #: 50159 Summary: tuple_cat only accepts two arguments Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3