--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 21:58 ---
The new decimal* classes are sometimes treated as classes, sometimes as
scalars. From a first look, something might be going wrong with the use of
__are_same in bits/std_iterator.h so that it needs special casing for
--- Comment #14 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 15:51 ---
Subject: Bug 35165
Author: janis
Date: Wed Mar 31 15:50:45 2010
New Revision: 157873
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157873
Log:
2010-03-31 Iain Sandoe
PR testsui
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 15:48 ---
Subject: Bug 23613
Author: janis
Date: Wed Mar 31 15:47:42 2010
New Revision: 157872
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157872
Log:
2010-03-31 Iain Sandoe
PR objc++/23613
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 22:25 ---
Subject: Bug 43512
Author: janis
Date: Thu Mar 25 22:25:05 2010
New Revision: 157731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157731
Log:
2010-03-25 Iain Sandoe
PR objc/35165
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 22:25 ---
Subject: Bug 35165
Author: janis
Date: Thu Mar 25 22:25:05 2010
New Revision: 157731
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157731
Log:
2010-03-25 Iain Sandoe
PR objc/35165
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-25 18:07 ---
Iain, these tests pass if the tests are run after "make install" because then
the objc header files are found in the install tree. I tested your patch but
installed first, that's why I didn
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-24 22:53 ---
Subject: Bug 41609
Author: janis
Date: Wed Mar 24 22:52:47 2010
New Revision: 157716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157716
Log:
2010-03-24 Iain Sandoe
PR testsui
--- Comment #10 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-24 22:51 ---
Subject: Bug 42348
Author: janis
Date: Wed Mar 24 22:51:08 2010
New Revision: 157715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157715
Log:
2010-03-24 Iain Sandoe
PR testsui
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 17:27 ---
The tests also fail on powerpc64-linux, although the first one gets the same
error with and without optimization.
elm3c105% cat 43374-1.c
int func(_Decimal32 v) {
return __builtin_isinf(v);
}
elm3c105% /home/janis
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 21:27 ---
Subject: Bug 43363
Author: janis
Date: Mon Mar 15 21:27:23 2010
New Revision: 157467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157467
Log:
PR testsuite/43363
* g++.dg/ext/alti
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 23:25 ---
In response to comment #4, it looks like that change would fix the problem in
trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43349
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 23:12 ---
I can't find that parameter in trunk, just in the graphite branch. The branch
is fine, it's trunk that's taking a long time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43349
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43349
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-10 18:35 ---
GCC 3.4 also has this bug.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43249
--- Comment #11 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 21:54 ---
In response to comment #10, there are several duplicates to similar bug PR18770
and demand for a fix from within my company.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 21:17 ---
With today's trunk both testcases fail with -m32 but not -m64. sixtrack
builds, but not applu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42326
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 19:27 ---
The minimized testcase and 175.vpr still fail on powerpc64-linux with "-O2
-ftree-loop-distribution" for both -m32 and -m64. With the confirmation in
comment #2 this report ought to be moved from UNCONFIR
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-23 19:07 ---
Is there a reason this hasn't been fixed? If not, I'll try.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
u
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc d
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-12 20:36 ---
In the attached testcase wrong code is generated for the loop in subroutine
sub3 that sets 12 of the elements of array k to zero. While minimizing the
testcase I saw different kinds of bad code for that array, but
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-12 20:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=19853)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19853&action=view)
minimized executable testcase
Compile with "-m64 -O2 -maltivec -ftree-vectorize -fdata-sections&qu
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-11 01:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=19837)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19837&action=view)
minimized testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43026
de
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43026
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-11 00:50 ---
I tried the patch and it fixes both of the problems with eon.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42344
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 22:48 ---
Alan, do you have an update on this? Does you patch fix just the ICE or also
the runtime segfault described in comment #2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42344
mponent: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43023
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-09 22:38 ---
Peter and Mike, can one of you please look at this bug? It looks like
something that you could figure out without a minimized testcase, but if it
helps I'll come up with one. I can also do a regression hunt if
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-09 21:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=19832)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19832&action=view)
minimized executable testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43012
wrong code for -floop-strip-mine in 453.povray
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-08 21:13 ---
Fixed by the patch in comment #5.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 23:18 ---
This was fixed in the GCC 4.3 branch on 2009-02-25.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39034
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 23:15 ---
This is fixed for GCC 4.5.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39037
y: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42696
--- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-11 22:10 ---
I bootstrapped on powerpc64-linux c,c++,fortran with the earlier big
selective-scheduling patch plus the patch in comment #7 of this PR and the
patch in comment #4 of PR42246. The resulting GCC gets no failures for
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-11 20:29 ---
Subject: Bug 42416
Author: janis
Date: Mon Jan 11 20:29:40 2010
New Revision: 155816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155816
Log:
PR target/42416
* config/rs6000/
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 18:02 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42416 ***
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 18:02 ---
*** Bug 42419 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42416
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 18:01 ---
*** Bug 42417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42416
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 18:01 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42416 ***
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 22:07 ---
I still see both failures with -m32 on powerpc64-linux but not with -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42326
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 21:47 ---
The testcase still fails with current mailing when compiled with "-m64 -O2" or
"-m64 -O1 -fschedule-insns". The testcase is missing the piece that makes it
useful a
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-07 01:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=19495)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19495&action=view)
minimized executable testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42644
al
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42644
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 23:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=19493)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19493&action=view)
minimized executable testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42640
code for -ftree-loop-distribution in 175.vpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot or
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 18:52 ---
I should have mentioned in comment #2 that the ICE for sixtrack only happens
with -m32, not -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42246
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 18:48 ---
The patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01209.html fixes the
testcase in the submitter's description, but there is code in CPU2000 test
200.sixtrack that triggers the same ICE with the same s
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 18:44 ---
With the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01209.html the
testcase in the submitter's description no longer fails, but there is other
code in 197.parser that gets the same ICE with the same op
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 18:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=19488)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19488&action=view)
executable testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42637
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42637
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 00:53 ---
Currently the compiler explicitly allows "-mvsx -mno-altivec". If those
options are used together, should vsx and altivec both be turned on, or both
turned off?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 22:12 ---
I get the same error with mainline built today. I'm using a compiler that
defaults to -m32; it works fine with -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42427
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 18:06 ---
No testcase yet, I was hoping to get bergner or meissner to look at it since
they have access to the benchmark.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42431
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 41605
Author: janis
Date: Tue Dec 22 22:11:27 2009
New Revision: 155408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155408
Log:
2009-12-22 Iain Sandoe
gcc/
PR targ
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:51 ---
The bug (which I didn't know from the documentation) is that -mvsx -mno-altivec
is not a valid combination but is not reported as an error. Instead the
compiler accepts it and then generates invalid
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 23:03 ---
Oh yeah, 176.gcc fails with the same options. With test input it runs for a
few minutes instead of a couple of seconds, and the results are wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42431
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42431
exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 00:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=19341)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19341&action=view)
Minimized testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42419
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: poewrpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42419
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42417
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42416
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-16 00:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=19317)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19317&action=view)
Minimized testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42389
with sel-schd for 175.vpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reporte
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-16 00:16 ---
With GCC 4.4.2 using the same options, the minimized testcase compiles cleanly
and 176.gcc compiles and executes successfully.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42388
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-16 00:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=19316)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19316&action=view)
Minimized testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42388
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42388
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-12 00:27 ---
The testcase with the options shown in the submitter's description compiles
cleanly with the current 4.4 branch and with GCC 4.4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42294
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-10 17:25 ---
The ICE happens with either -m32 or -m64, but after this same patch eon
segfaults in a destructor when compiled with "-m32 -O2 -fPIC" when built with
GCC with secureplt enabled. valgrind reports some oth
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42344
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42334
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 00:31 ---
This testcase minimized from 173.applu fails in the same place when compiled
with "-m32 -O2 floop-strip-mine -fprefetch-loop-arrays" on powerpc64-linux.
subroutine blts ( ldmx, ldmy, v, tmp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 01:07 ---
The ICE occurs with a compiler built for powerpc64-linux but only for -m32 (the
default for my compiler), not for -m64. It does not occur for a powerpc-linux
compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 01:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=19233)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19233&action=view)
Minimized testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42294
s
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc d
P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42285
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 20:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=19227)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19227&action=view)
Minimized testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42284
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42284
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-02 18:10 ---
The option -fipa-type-escape is not documented on its own, just with
-fipa-struct-reorg which says it's needed with that option. Shouldn't broken
options at least be documented as experimental?
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-02 01:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=19205)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19205&action=view)
minimized testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42250
words: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42250
s: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42249
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-02 00:07 ---
Oops.
GCC trunk fails execution for five tests from gcc.dg/compat when compiled with
"-m64 -O1 -fschedule-insns" on powerpc64-linux. The tests are:
gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-16_main.c
gcc.dg/com
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42248
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42246
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target tri
edTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42244
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-30 19:15 ---
Subject: Bug 42212
Author: janis
Date: Mon Nov 30 19:14:58 2009
New Revision: 154837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154837
Log:
PR testsuite/42212
* gcc.target/powerpc/
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-02 20:33 ---
HJ, I couldn't reproduce the failure so please verify that the patch fixes the
error.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-02 19:32 ---
Subject: Bug 41878
Author: janis
Date: Mon Nov 2 19:32:05 2009
New Revision: 153821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153821
Log:
PR testsuite/41878
* gfortran.dg/vect/ve
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-23 23:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=18884)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18884&action=view)
minimized testcase
Minimized testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41812
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unkn
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-22 18:24 ---
Subject: Bug 41049
Author: janis
Date: Thu Oct 22 18:24:31 2009
New Revision: 153468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153468
Log:
Backport from 4.3 branch:
2009-09-2
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-12 17:13 ---
Subject: Bug 41659
Author: janis
Date: Mon Oct 12 17:13:41 2009
New Revision: 152671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152671
Log:
PR testsuite/41659
* gcc.dg/lto/2009
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-12 16:06 ---
It doesn't have the desired or expected effect, just the documented effect.
>From the GCC internals manual section 6.4.6 Support for testing link-time
optimizations: "Unlike dg-do, dg-lto-do does n
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-22 16:16 ---
Fixed in trunk, 4.4 branch, 4.3 branch.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-21 16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 41049
Author: janis
Date: Mon Sep 21 16:22:43 2009
New Revision: 151934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151934
Log:
PR c/41049
* real.c decimal_from
1 - 100 of 930 matches
Mail list logo
