[Bug c++/118631] Public class member as const reference to protected member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118631 --- Comment #4 from Jörg Brüggmann --- Aha. Got it. Thank you!

[Bug c++/118631] New: Public class member as const reference to protected member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118631 Bug ID: 118631 Summary: Public class member as const reference to protected member Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105523] Wrong warning array subscript [0] is outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105523 William Westfield changed: What|Removed |Added CC||westfw at westfw dot info --- Comme

[Bug c++/108180] New: [OpenMP] Passing a class member variable to firstprivate() erroneously calls its dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108180 Bug ID: 108180 Summary: [OpenMP] Passing a class member variable to firstprivate() erroneously calls its dtor Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c++/105885] [12/13 Regression] the address of 'template argument' will never be NULL warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105885 --- Comment #3 from Markus Ebner --- > I guess reporters reasoning is that ARG is defaulted to nullptr and that's > the reason the diagnostic is unwanted? I don't think it has any todo with whether nullptr is the default value for ARG or not.

[Bug c++/105885] New: [Regression]: Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will never be NULL [-Waddress]" with const char* template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105885 Bug ID: 105885 Summary: [Regression]: Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will never be NULL [-Waddress]" with const char* template argument Product: gcc Ver

[Bug c++/105220] New: Incorrect concept evaluation when friend class is involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105220 Bug ID: 105220 Summary: Incorrect concept evaluation when friend class is involved Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/89069] ICE in select type with function returning class array pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89069 --- Comment #3 from Antony Lewis --- This bug is still valid as of gcc 11.2.1 20220114 15 | end module test | 1 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0x160a5b7 internal_error(char const*, ...) ???:0 0x764849

[Bug c++/104020] New: [coroutines] ICE in co_await function call with initializer_list arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104020 Bug ID: 104020 Summary: [coroutines] ICE in co_await function call with initializer_list arguments Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug fortran/103942] [10 Regression] invalid memory reference with allocatable string and class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942 --- Comment #1 from Antony Lewis --- Also broken in 9.4.1 20220107.

[Bug fortran/103942] New: [10 Regression] invalid memory reference with allocatable string and class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942 Bug ID: 103942 Summary: [10 Regression] invalid memory reference with allocatable string and class(*) Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug fortran/103390] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r12-4591-g1af78e731feb9327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390 --- Comment #10 from Antony Lewis --- I think you are right, it does not seem to fix it. I made https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 (may also be duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103391)

[Bug fortran/103898] New: [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898 Bug ID: 103898 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug fortran/103390] [12 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed since r12-4591-g1af78e731feb9327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103390 --- Comment #7 from Antony Lewis --- I see similar error in another fortran code, full trace in https://app.travis-ci.com/github/cmbant/CosmoMC/jobs/552809686

[Bug c++/103747] New: Passing parameter pack expansion to alias template with one argument fails as function return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103747 Bug ID: 103747 Summary: Passing parameter pack expansion to alias template with one argument fails as function return type Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/100987] New: make distclean error "hwasan: No such file or directory"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100987 Bug ID: 100987 Summary: make distclean error "hwasan: No such file or directory" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/89067] Inaccurate error message: 'i' at (1) is not a member of the 'x' structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89067 --- Comment #4 from Antony Lewis --- I agree it may be technically correct, but it is not helpful (esp. if your base class is an empty hierarchy root class, so all derived classes in the program would give this same error).

[Bug libstdc++/97232] New: Iterator category of "std::prev" are not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97232 Bug ID: 97232 Summary: Iterator category of "std::prev" are not checked Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: l