http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59898
--- Comment #5 from ignat at gmx dot net ---
16 overloadable memory allocation functions??? brave new world!
Nothing against the possibility to have explicit alignment (when you need to
align to a cache line, page or disk-block), but why not just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59898
--- Comment #2 from ignat at gmx dot net ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> User error. The standard allocators don't guarantee sufficient alignment
> for the vector types.
OMG, I see. Thx for clarifying. So this means
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ignat at gmx dot net
Created attachment 31904
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31904&action=edit
avx_bug.cc
The following code segfaults when compiled with -mavx or -mavx2 on g++ (Debian
4.7.2-5) 4
