https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602
--- Comment #3 from Brad Huntting ---
Oops. I missed that part. Thanks.
brad
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:56 PM, miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602
>
> --- Comment #2
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: huntting at glarp dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36343
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36343&action=edit
example.cc
For an unsigned E1, E1<=N.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #6 from Brad Huntting 2013-01-23
23:59:39 UTC ---
Er... The asm()s are beside the point. There is no reording bug. The
problem is that the 3 volatile assignments are being squished into 1. BTW:
I first noticed this with th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Bug #: 56077
Summary: volatile ignored when function inlined
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal