https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108536
--- Comment #2 from hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com ---
I can see that, and that would work. But it really seems like a work-around? Is
there a reason for the difference in behavior?
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In the code below I have used a requires-clause. This requires-clause used to
be an enable_if. When using enable_if the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61936
hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hr.jonas.hansen at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78907
--- Comment #2 from hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com ---
This is not an issue with g++ 5.2.1, did the default stack size change?
There is actually no need for using 65536 even -fconstexpr-depth=26000 will
ensure the crash, on my computer.
How do
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I recently updated my g++ version to 6.3.0 (g++ (Homebrew GCC 6.3.0) 6.3.0),
but now i get the following error:
g++: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61936
hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hr.jonas.hansen at