--- Comment #5 from hayward at loup dot net 2007-04-22 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: postfix increment semantics implemented incorrectly
> Why do you say could blow the stack, the C++ standard actually mentions an
> optimization where the copy constructored is removed and there is no
--- Comment #3 from hayward at loup dot net 2007-04-22 06:40 ---
Subject: Re: postfix increment semantics implemented incorrectly
Thanks for the quick response. I do not, however, agree with this
interpretation of ISO/IEC FDIS 14882:1998(E) 13.5.7/1.
The spec trivially exemplifies
