--- Comment #46 from harry dot he at freescale dot com 2010-06-11 01:09
---
Mark, I have reported the issue to CodeSourcery and waiting them to confirm, I
guess our toolchain may need different patches for it, or there is something
wrong in my validation.
--
harry dot he at
--- Comment #44 from harry dot he at freescale dot com 2010-06-10 09:03
---
Thanks for your reminding, Mark.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44364
--- Comment #40 from harry dot he at freescale dot com 2010-06-09 09:23
---
with my toolchain (From CodeSourcery, 4.4-78), o1test gives correct behavior
with built-in flags(-te500v2), but wrong behaviors with "-fcaller-saves -O
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-dce -fno-split-wide-
--- Comment #39 from harry dot he at freescale dot com 2010-06-09 08:59
---
Hi, Kyle Moffett,
in testall.c, r9 is used by a register variable, however, in E500ABI guide,
r9 should be used for parameter passing, this test case seems not reasonable.
Harry He
--
http
sm__ __volatile__("lwsync": : : "memory");
+ #endif
--
Summary: illegal instruction "lwsync" reported on e500
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boehm-gc
