--- Comment #7 from gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2008-03-16 06:41 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> As a workaround can you try using all of the sysroot framework?
Thanks for looking at this Carlos. But the sysroot stuff is not really suited
to a non /usr layout. For example, with
--- Comment #5 from gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2008-03-12 11:26 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> The example you describe looks an awful lot like a cross-compile.
No, it's definitely native. See below.
> Is there
> anything preventing you from configuring wi
--- Comment #3 from gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2008-03-10 22:52 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It is better to use -B $prefix/lib while building.
-B doesn't work on multilib ie: -B $prefix/lib doesn't find
$prefix/lib/../lib64
Not only that, I'm talking about GC
--- Comment #1 from gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2008-03-10 22:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=15292)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15292&action=view)
Patch that restores old behaviour (for demonstration only)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
on: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gschafer at zip dot com dot au
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35532
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gschafer at zip dot com dot au
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35239
--- Comment #7 from gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2006-10-11 06:18 ---
The root cause of this bug is obvious after studying gcc.c. Essentially, the
user specified specs are read _way_ too late in the process. The sequence is
roughly this:
1 - search for default specs file, if found
tatus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libmudflap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gschafer at zip dot com dot au
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-07-26
06:07 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixed at least in 4.0.1.
No it's not.
Please see these results for example (all from different folks):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg01370.h
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-07-20
02:31 ---
Stock Linux kernel 2.6.12 introduced "address space randimization" which appears
to be essentially the same thing as RH's exec-shield-randomize. More info about
this issue here:
http://gcc
Summary: libstdc++ testsuite broken
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gschafer at zip dot com dot
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-03-29
23:41 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'll apply the patch and report back later if it fixes the problem. Would be
> nice to get this applied on the 4.0 branch. Thanks.
It did indeed fix the prob
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-03-29
04:53 ---
I just hit this trying to compile psmisc-21.6 with snapshot gcc-4.0-20050326:
pstree.c: In function 'dump_tree':
pstree.c:539: internal compiler error: in cgraph_mark_reachable_node, at
cgraph.c
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-02-24
06:43 ---
Here's the fix to pthread.h from Glibc cvs. I suppose the fixinclude "fix" would
need to replicate this:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/glibc-cvs/2005-q1/msg00303.html
--
http://gcc.g
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-02-24
04:39 ---
This also happens for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu. It's a bog-standard unpatched
NPTL-enabled glibc-2.3.4 system. I don't think it classifies as a "bad glibc". I
concur that some fixi
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-27
21:39 ---
The patch was approved by the RM here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00850.html
but it is still not applied. It would be great if you could pls commit this
patch then close the BZ.
Many
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-12
05:46 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm, this SPEC should be removed from the mainline, it is unused in GCC at
> all.
Ok, good. I suppose removing faulty code is better then leaving it there for
folks to (
bove technique and it works fine.
I tried 3.4.3 and 4.0 and this bug is present in both.
Thankyou
--
Summary: Faulty handling of startfile_prefix_spec
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-05
00:19 ---
Here are some timimgs from my test runs. This is all done with:
--enable-languages=c
--disable-checking
make bootstrap
gcc-4.014:50
gcc-4.012.25-> with STAGE1_CHECKING manually remo
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-02
22:27 ---
> This is an urban legend.
I agree with the above comment, but you've completely missed my point.
With gcc-3.4.3, I can `make bootstrap' with --enable-languages=c and it takes
7:25. With gcc-
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-02
02:41 ---
Like I said, fairynuff.
But users will definitely notice slower bootstraps, thus further contributing to
the perceived feeling that GCC is forever getting slower. It will be a shame
IMHO.
If the extra
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-02
02:30 ---
Because it currently makes my bootstraps slow as molasses. Yes, stage 2 and 3
are fine. But I thought released compilers were meant to have checking switched
off completely. If you release the compiler like
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-02
02:21 ---
Fairynuff.
As long as someone remembers to switch it off before release, because if not, it
will then clearly be a bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19223
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gschafer at zip dot com dot au
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gn
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-01-01
01:18 ---
I've just hit this while trying to build Glibc with current GCC trunk. It's a
showstopper.
--
What|Removed
25 matches
Mail list logo