[Bug inline-asm/21396] inline asm doesn't compile with -O2 optimization

2005-05-08 Thread gleb76 at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From gleb76 at gmail dot com 2005-05-08 08:16 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Fixed for 4.0.0 and above. I know it works in 4.0.0 but 3.4.3 is a default compiler shiped by RedHat. Is this going to be fixed in 3.4 line of compilers? -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug inline-asm/21396] New: inline asm doesn't compile with -O2 optimization

2005-05-05 Thread gleb76 at gmail dot com
Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: inline-asm AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gleb76 at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build tri

[Bug debug/19251] gstabs emits wrong entry for "unsigned int/long" types on powerpc

2005-01-04 Thread gleb76 at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From gleb76 at gmail dot com 2005-01-04 11:01 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hmm, what version of gdb is this, since I tried on ppc-darwin and it produces what you consided back > stabs and it worked (this is gdb 5.3). > gdb 5.3 doesn't work for

[Bug debug/19251] gstabs emits wrong entry for "unsigned int/long" types on powerpc

2005-01-04 Thread gleb76 at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From gleb76 at gmail dot com 2005-01-04 09:02 --- I forgot to mension the gdb I've tried are 6.0 and 6.3. The problem is in the stabsread.c file in function read_huge_number. The stabs produce much smaller output for me. The result file using stabs is 23

[Bug c/19251] New: gstabs emits wrong entry for "unsigned int/long" types on powerpc

2005-01-04 Thread gleb76 at gmail dot com
on powerpc Product: gcc Version: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gleb76 at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at