[Bug c/34803] wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer

2008-01-18 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #6 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2008-01-18 16:21 --- Subject: Re: wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer > looks good for 4.2. Can we see (assembler) output of that 4.2, with those same `-fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing' optimization opti

[Bug c/34803] wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer

2008-01-17 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #5 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2008-01-17 17:45 --- Subject: test case [Re: wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer] No test case program hitting this wrong code will do something reliably: the code incorrectness is passing uninitialized value to the rest of

[Bug c/34803] wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer

2008-01-15 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #3 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2008-01-16 00:49 --- Subject: Re: wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer > obviously violating c aliasing rules here. Certainly. Was quite explicit about that: That is, `-fno-strict-aliasing' no longer

[Bug c/34803] wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer

2008-01-15 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #1 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2008-01-15 21:41 --- Created an attachment (id=14944) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14944&action=view) preprocessed code in question Instead of `extptr', uninitialized value is passed to `handle_

[Bug c/34803] New: wrong code for dereferencing type-punned pointer

2008-01-15 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
ct: gcc Version: 4.2.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gin at mo dot msk dot ru GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet:

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2007-01-12 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #8 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2007-01-13 01:15 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ Wrote on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:35:39 +0300: > will try it for 3.0.3 Did so. `--with-ld=/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld' it did link programs properly even if `$(build_tooldir)/bin

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-12-29 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #7 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-12-29 14:35 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ > Can you give the output of the original confgure which should show you which > ld/as GCC is going to use? No. Version 4 just does not build on that system at all (o

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-12-28 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #5 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-12-28 13:32 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ It actually broke build of gcc (version 3.0.3) at least on one class of systems, i386-pc-sco3.2v5, as follows. Had on that system gnu binutils installed with PREFIX. Had gcc

[Bug other/29700] check requires autogen

2006-11-06 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #6 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-11-06 17:24 --- Subject: Re: check requires autogen `make' performing all tests is not enough to test successfully. The test failures normally result in make error, ignored by `-k' or not. One looks for such error message

[Bug other/29700] check requires autogen

2006-11-03 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #4 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-11-03 20:03 --- Subject: Re: check requires autogen Sorry for not indicating that. Always specified `-k' in all `make' runs. They yield the results as described. The gist is that currently the only way to obtain actual t

[Bug other/29700] check requires autogen

2006-11-03 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #2 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-11-03 19:43 --- Subject: Re: check requires autogen Certainly ran `make check' in top level build directory, and indicated that by including parts of `make -w' output, printout of directories entered and left by `make'

[Bug bootstrap/29620] can not build libgcc.a on stage 1

2006-10-31 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #3 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-10-31 19:17 --- Subject: Re: can not build libgcc.a on stage 1 Obsoleting sparc-sun-solaris2.5, if ever occurred for 4.1 branch, is certainly not noted in neither `NEWS' nor `INSTALL/specific.html' of 4.1.1 release.

[Bug other/29622] broken anchor name in html

2006-10-27 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #2 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-10-27 20:18 --- Subject: Re: broken anchor name in html Confirming that anchor names are consistent in http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html Hope that the updated version will get in next gcc release. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-09-04 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #4 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-09-04 20:02 --- A question was sent to original reporter: > Why do you think this wrong? If it was needed at all, the actions on the bug could have depended on the answer, and whether it should be closed could be decided only af

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

2006-09-04 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #3 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-09-04 19:32 --- Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/ > Why do you think this wrong? -B. is suppied first so this is not a bug If during build all files are found through `-B./' (or other specification of part of build tree co

[Bug bootstrap/28469] stage2 error: toplev.c redefines floor_log2

2006-07-24 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #3 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-07-24 19:52 --- Subject: Re: stage2 error: toplev.c redefines floor_log2 On other system where that translation module compiles normally there are also 2 definitions of the same function, but even function type declarations in

[Bug debug/28099] loses type in debug info

2006-06-23 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #2 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-06-23 19:57 --- Subject: Re: loses type in debug info As for marking the bug as already reported, this seems plausible to me. Confirming that `.i' sent in my bug report uses "lost" type in exactly the same way as test c

[Bug bootstrap/25002] build breaks if no `NAN'

2005-11-23 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #4 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2005-11-23 18:08 --- Subject: Re: build breaks if no `NAN' Know at least one more system that has no `NAN' and which native `cc' normally generates code that causes program to terminate abnormally: Arithmetic Exception (co

[Bug bootstrap/25002] build breaks if no `NAN'

2005-11-23 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #3 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2005-11-23 15:58 --- Subject: Re: build breaks if no `NAN' Did that. This particular translation unit compiles. With warning telling the same. For this particular system there is a workaround, but does it have to be on any system?