--- Comment #17 from gdsjaar at sandia dot gov 2009-07-08 21:03 ---
Subject: Re: Support -fnosign-zero for SIGN
intrinsic for Fortran 77 compatibility
Thanks for the quick response. I agree that the ultimate fix is to
remove that idiom from the code; however, when dealing with
--- Comment #8 from gdsjaar at sandia dot gov 2009-07-07 20:13 ---
Subject: Re: sign intrinsic fails for value of 0.0
OK, sorry for the buggy example code. It illustrates the folly of
improving the code after doing the runs. A better fixed code
illustrating my point is
--- Comment #3 from gdsjaar at sandia dot gov 2009-07-07 19:51 ---
Subject: Re: sign intrinsic fails for value of 0.0
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 19:43 ---
> (In reply to comment #0)
>
>>
: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdsjaar at sandia dot gov
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40675
above array bounds.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdsjaar at sandia dot gov
GCC build triplet:
