[Bug c/36402] -0x80000000 (INT_MIN, -2147483648) treated as unsigned

--- Comment #5 from gcczilla at achurch dot org 2008-06-01 13:59 --- Thanks for the clarification. (To be honest, I wouldn't have thought to look in the "Incompatibilities" section--I haven't touched a non-ANSI compiler for over a decade--but either way I guess i

[Bug c/36402] -0x80000000 (INT_MIN) erroneously treated as unsigned

--- Comment #2 from gcczilla at achurch dot org 2008-06-01 04:17 --- Fair enough, but GCC's documentation explicitly says (gcc.info section 4.5): * `Whether signed integer types are represented using sign and magnitude, two's complement, or one's complement,

[Bug c/36402] New: -0x80000000 (INT_MIN) erroneously treated as unsigned

000 (INT_MIN) erroneously treated as unsigned Product: gcc Version: 4.2.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcczilla at achurch dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36402

[Bug c/31008] New: float value not equal to itself after assignment

mmary: float value not equal to itself after assignment Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcczilla at achur

[Bug regression/23328] Improper removal of struct field assignments by optimizer

--- Additional Comments From gcczilla at achurch dot org 2005-08-11 16:01 --- Created an attachment (id=9473) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9473&action=view) Sample source file demonstrating bug -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23328

[Bug regression/23327] Improper removal of struct field assignments by optimizer

--- Additional Comments From gcczilla at achurch dot org 2005-08-11 16:00 --- Sorry, accidentally submitted while typing--refiled as bug 23328. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug regression/23328] New: Improper removal of struct field assignments by optimizer

.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcczilla at achurch dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-lin

[Bug regression/23327] New: Improper removal of struct field assignments by optimizer

Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcczilla at achurch dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build

[Bug c/20076] __builtin_return(__builtin_apply()) inlined incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From gcczilla at achurch dot org 2005-02-19 12:59 --- Created an attachment (id=8233) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8233&action=view) gcc test.c -S -O2 -finline-functions (bad) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20076

[Bug c/20076] __builtin_return(__builtin_apply()) inlined incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From gcczilla at achurch dot org 2005-02-19 12:58 --- Created an attachment (id=8232) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8232&action=view) gcc test.c -S -O2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20076

[Bug c/20076] __builtin_return(__builtin_apply()) inlined incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From gcczilla at achurch dot org 2005-02-19 12:57 --- Created an attachment (id=8231) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8231&action=view) Test source file (from description) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20076

[Bug c/20076] New: __builtin_return(__builtin_apply()) inlined incorrectly

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcczilla at achurch dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20076