https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88545
--- Comment #4 from Georg Sauthoff ---
Sam, thank you for the hint and surfacing it again.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
[..]
> I would prefer to do simply:
[..]
Yes, please go ahead with your approach.
> I think we're going t
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gcc at gms dot tf
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48033
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48033&action=edit
demonstrate how bar function yields superfluous stackpointer instructions
GC
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gcc at gms dot tf
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45259
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45259&action=edit
specialize std::find to mem
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gcc at gms dot tf
Target Milestone: ---
Minimal example:
#include
void foo(__m128i x, unsigned char*o)
{
_mm_storeu_si64((void*)o, x);
}
Excpected behaviour: compiles fine with gcc -march=haswell
Actual behaviour
: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gcc at gms dot tf
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
When compiling a program with both
