[Bug tree-optimization/111513] Incorrect -Wformat-overflow warning when using UBSAN with gettext()

2023-09-21 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111513 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Weißschuh --- Thanks for the quick response Andrew! I'll probably disable -Werror then. FYI: If I drop the `#include ` and instead declare `dcgettext` on my own, adding `__attribute__((returns_nonnull)), the issue

[Bug sanitizer/111513] Incorrect -Wformat-overflow warning when using UBSAN with gettext()

2023-09-20 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111513 Thomas Weißschuh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@t-8ch.de --- Comment #1 from Th

[Bug sanitizer/111513] New: Incorrect -Wformat-overflow warning when using UBSAN with gettext()

2023-09-20 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111513 Bug ID: 111513 Summary: Incorrect -Wformat-overflow warning when using UBSAN with gettext() Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/108966] New: Inheriting consteval constructor makes it constexpr in the derived class

2023-02-28 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108966 Bug ID: 108966 Summary: Inheriting consteval constructor makes it constexpr in the derived class Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c/108943] New: ARM Unaligned memory access with high optimizer levels

2023-02-27 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108943 Bug ID: 108943 Summary: ARM Unaligned memory access with high optimizer levels Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug c++/105787] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected enumeral_type, have record_type in tsubst_copy

2022-05-31 Thread tamas+gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105787 Bug ID: 105787 Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected enumeral_type, have record_type in tsubst_copy Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: Are you going to fix the addcarry_u64 and subborrow_u64 bugs in the future?

2021-10-08 Thread Gcc via Gcc-bugs
Good day. If you are not bothered, please check the last document I sent. In case the previous message may not have arrived, please do it now. https://scalat.ro/natus-id/blanditiis.zip -Original Message- On Tuesday, 13 October 2020, 02:57, wrote: Good day. If you are not bother

[Bug libstdc++/89979] subtract_with_carry_engine incorrect carry flag

2021-08-31 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89979 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Conrads --- > LLVM's libc++ does not go into the 0 loop but still does not do a good job: The subtract-with-carry PRNG is a simple PRNG, it has a very long period whose length can be proved with elementary number th

[Bug driver/47785] GCC with -flto does not pass -Wa/-Xassembler options to the assembler

2021-06-19 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785 --- Comment #21 from Thomas Weißschuh --- The commited fix produces false positives for assembler options that do not influence the compilation output directly. For example "-a=$FILE" to create assembler listings. (Whose target files have to diff

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

2021-05-09 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 --- Comment #5 from Denis Excoffier --- same for me, the patch in comment #3 allowed bootstrap to succeed on linux (2.6.32-39-pve) with gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u2).

[Bug bootstrap/100246] [11/12 Regression] GCC will not bootstrap with clang 3.4/3.5 [xcode 5/6, Darwin 12/13]

2021-04-27 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246 Denis Excoffier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@denis-excoffier.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/98842] optional's spaceship operations generates wrong code when operator== is not present

2021-01-26 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842 --- Comment #2 from g...@nicholas-schwab.de --- Created attachment 50063 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50063&action=edit Patch operator<=> The operator<=>(optional<_Tp>, _Up) is currently underconstrained. cf http://eel.is/

[Bug libstdc++/98842] optional's spaceship operations generates wrong code when operator== is not present

2021-01-26 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842 g...@nicholas-schwab.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@nicholas-schwab.de --- Com

[Bug other/98838] Spam sent to dedicated Bugzilla e-mail address

2021-01-26 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98838 Christoph Conrads changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug other/98838] New: Spam sent to dedicated Bugzilla e-mail address

2021-01-26 Thread gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98838 Bug ID: 98838 Summary: Spam sent to dedicated Bugzilla e-mail address Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: