https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
--- Comment #22 from Denis Excoffier ---
I'm also happy with the above patch. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
--- Comment #7 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #6)
There is no lldb here, and also no direct 'bt' available. I used gdb with a
break point:
% cd /tmp/lcl/tmp/gcc/obj
%
% grep -n 'gcc_assert (sizeof reg_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #32 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #31)
> WONTFIX sounds reasonable
Okay.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@denis-excoffier.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #9 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #8)
Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #50 from Denis Excoffier ---
gcc-4.9.1-RC-20140710 bootstraps perfectly. Thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #45 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #44)
> shouldn't it be possible to make it available to 4.9.0, instead of 4.9.1?
No because 4.9.0 is out.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #44 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #42)
> Second variant of the patch looks ok to me, if bootstrap works for 32-bit
> and 64-bit cygwin.
Post patch to ML for gcc trunk, and if no further issues
> are prese
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #38 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #37)
> Regarding your patch:
I've tested it and it works (as far as i can tell): the bootstrap has gone
until the end (installation in ${prefix}). objdump -d crtbeg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #36 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #35)
> would not using --disable-sjlj-excaptions cause any problems,
> maybe a unwanted ABI-Change?
I don't know really. Cygwin people usually build gcc using
--disa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #34 from Denis Excoffier ---
The patch under attachment 32651 seems to make bootstrapping behave better, at
least for i686.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #33 from Denis Excoffier ---
Created attachment 32651
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32651&action=edit
bootstrap works at least under i686
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #26 from Denis Excoffier ---
After more investigation, it seems that the culprit can be
--disable-sjlj-exceptions. Since the beginning (last Sunday), each time i use
it on the command line, the build fails and each time i don't use it,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #21 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #17)
> Just as side-note, I tried to reproduce your reported issue and did a
> personal build of cygwin's gcc. It worked fine in stage2. I couldn't
> reproduce the repo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #20 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12)
> In general it would be of interest
> to learn what destructors (by whom) are present in the list called by
> do_global_dtors (&__DTOR_LIST__)
I've rebuilt everyth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #19 from Denis Excoffier ---
Created attachment 32602
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32602&action=edit
discover __DTOR_LIST__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #14 from Denis Excoffier ---
I'm now using plain cygwin-1.7.29-2, the cygwin1.dbg now matches with
cygwin1.dll. I've alto tried to recompile without -O2. I'm not so familiar with
gdb, i've produced a session where i break at __call_exi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #13 from Denis Excoffier ---
Created attachment 32600
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32600&action=edit
gdb session stepping until the end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #10 from Denis Excoffier ---
Created attachment 32595
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32595&action=edit
gdb session catching signal SIGABRT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #9 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> I guess for start, it would be nice to see backtrace from the debugger about
> where the segfault and/or abort happened.
See attachment 3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #7 from Denis Excoffier ---
Here are the config.log found at top level and the config.log at
i686-pc-cygwin/libgcc level (see attachments).
What do you need more specifically?
I have to say that i use gmp-6.0.0a, mpfr-3.1.2 (without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #6 from Denis Excoffier ---
Created attachment 32592
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32592&action=edit
i686-pc-cygwin/libgcc/config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
--- Comment #5 from Denis Excoffier ---
Created attachment 32591
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32591&action=edit
top level config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-cygwin
Host|
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: g...@denis-excoffier.org
Installed gcc-4.9.0-RC-20140411 on darwin (Mavericks) with no problem. But:
On Cygwin 1.7.29-2 (+ latests patches), platform=i686-pc-cygwin (Windows XP
SP3, 32 bits), bootstrap stops with:
xgcc: internal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #7 from Denis Excoffier ---
The bug is no longer present in GCC 4.8.2 (tested today under Cygwin 1.7.27 XP
32bits).
Please someone to update the WAITING field into RESOLVED (or WORKSFORME etc.).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #29 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #28)
> Well, there is a fix - which is to update
> /usr/lib/libgcc_s.dylib to a non-buggy version.
I had understood that it was desirable not to replace libgcc_s.dylib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
--- Comment #27 from Denis Excoffier ---
I (OP) suppose we can WONTFIX that one. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47016
--- Comment #4 from Denis Excoffier ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> Any reason to keep this PR open?
>From my side, no.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #16 from Denis Excoffier 2013-03-24
07:06:40 UTC ---
Bootstrap of gcc-4.7-20130323 works perfectly. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #11 from Denis Excoffier 2013-03-10
08:06:54 UTC ---
Please to find someone able to apply the above patches on branches 4.6 and 4.7?
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: g...@denis-excoffier.org
Bootstrap fails if the last texinfo (currently 4.13.96) is used (this was also
the case with at least 4.13.94 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55699
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55699
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28971|0 |1
is obsolete|
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: g...@denis-excoffier.org
Created attachment 28971
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28971
use gmp-5.1.0-RC2 (and later) embedded in source direct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
--- Comment #6 from Denis Excoffier 2012-01-30
23:16:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Please try
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c17
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52041#c18
> patches.
"Comparison successf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
--- Comment #4 from Denis Excoffier 2012-01-30
20:54:37 UTC ---
Compared with PR52041, i also have a cltq (or cdqe) missing, but it is missing
in stage2
and present in stage3. After all, i'm perhaps a duplicate of PR52041.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
--- Comment #3 from Denis Excoffier 2012-01-30
20:29:45 UTC ---
Tried again, using:
- gmp-5.0.2, like last week
- make with no -j option
Same result (ie gcc/gimplify.o differs).
Also, Xcpde 4.2.1 uses:
% /usr/bin/gcc --version
i686-apple-darwin1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52039
--- Comment #2 from Denis Excoffier 2012-01-30
11:14:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> How did you configure? Dup of PR51974?
.../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=... --with-local-prefix=...
--disable-multilib
I don't use --enab
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: g...@denis-excoffier.org
Host: *-apple-darwin*
Target: *-apple-darwin*
Build: *-apple-darwin*
On MacOSX (x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0), with the last snapshot
(gcc-4.7-20120128),
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51865
--- Comment #10 from Denis Excoffier 2012-01-22
10:18:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Fixed.
Confirmed, using gcc-4.7-20120121. Thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #6 from Denis Excoffier 2012-01-18
08:45:36 UTC ---
This bug was still present under gcc-4.7-20120107 snapshot, but it
does no longer show up under gcc-4.7-20120114 snapshot. I suppose it has
been corrected. Thank you.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: g...@denis-excoffier.org
Under MacOSX (x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0), the new gcc-4.7-20120114 gives ICE
with the following. There was no problem with the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #5 from Denis Excoffier 2011-12-19
15:31:46 UTC ---
Reduced test case is:
% cat exclude.c
int version;
int zz1(char *);
static void zz2(int flags)
{
static int initialized = 0;
char xx[4096];
if (initialized)
return;
initializ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #26 from Denis Excoffier 2011-12-19
07:36:33 UTC ---
Just for the record: gcc-4.7-20111210 works (with --enable-obsolete of course).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #4 from Denis Excoffier 2011-12-17
21:21:55 UTC ---
This patch, committed on the 6th of December (r182056), must be included in the
snapshot of last Saturday (r182194). I tried with this
gcc-4.7-20111210.tar.bz2, and sorry, the result
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39400
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@denis-excoffier.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.7.0
--- Comment #17 from Denis Excoff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
--- Comment #1 from Denis Excoffier 2011-12-01
09:04:00 UTC ---
Configure line was:
/tmp/lcl/tmp/gcc/gcc-4.7-2019/configure
--prefix=/tmp/lcl/uxl/gcc-4.7-2026 --with-local-prefix=/usr/local/here
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-sjlj-ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #12 from Denis Excoffier 2011-11-30
20:03:47 UTC ---
I have transfered my bug into #51366. Sorry for the noise.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: g...@denis-excoffier.org
Created attachment 25960
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25960
preprocessed exclude.c
Under last Cyg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@denis-excoffier.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51271
--- Comment #8 from Denis Excoffier 2011-11-28
07:41:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 25928
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25928
preprocessed exclude.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
--- Comment #2 from Denis Excoffier 2011-10-04
07:07:20 UTC ---
Also with mpfr-3.1.0 and also on Cygwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
--- Comment #1 from Denis Excoffier 2011-09-22
05:22:47 UTC ---
Also with mpfr-3.1.0-rc2.
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: g...@denis-excoffier.org
Hi,
I bootstrap gcc-4.6.1 by installing the gmp/, mpfr/ and mpc/ folders directly
in the GCC source tree as suggested in the
57 matches
Mail list logo