[Bug target/36713] [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-07-03 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #17 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2008-07-03 19:33 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > Well, the circumstances where the miscompilation occurs may be tricky. > So you say you have a testcase bu

[Bug target/36713] [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2008-07-03 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2008-07-03 09:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] r137252 breaks -O2 optimization on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 3 Jul 2008 09:42:44 -, rguenther at suse dot de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hm, I'm out of quick ideas

[Bug bootstrap/30678] sysmacros.h get currupt from Fixincludes with updated glibc.

2007-02-02 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2007-02-02 10:39 --- fixincludes/inclhack.def (glibc_c99_inline_4) deals with sys/sysmacros.h by replacing any "extern" with #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 19901L extern #endif Since your include defines "__ex

[Bug bootstrap/30008] bootstrapping failure: multiple function definitions

2006-11-28 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-11-28 15:18 --- Created an attachment (id=12703) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12703&action=view) /usr/include/x86_64-linux/bits/string2.h As requested by Andrew Pinski in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/

[Bug bootstrap/30008] New: bootstrapping failure: multiple function definitions

2006-11-28 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30008

[Bug fortran/29992] INTERFACE equivalent to MODULE PROCEDURE?!

2006-11-27 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-11-27 09:28 --- (report continued) $> cat foo2.f90 MODULE class_foo_type TYPE :: foo INTEGER :: dummy END TYPE END MODULE MODULE class_foo USE class_foo_type, ONLY: foo INTERFACE foo_init SUBROUTINE foo_init_defa

[Bug fortran/29992] New: INTERFACE equivalent to MODULE PROCEDURE?!

2006-11-27 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gn

[Bug libgomp/29949] implement argument checking for user accessable runtime routines

2006-11-22 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-11-22 23:12 --- Correction: checks are already implemented for environment variables. In above report OMP_NUM_THREADS is not affected, but omp_set_num_threads still is. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug libgomp/29949] New: implement argument checking for user accessable runtime routines

2006-11-22 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libgomp AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-

[Bug fortran/29759] ice on line continuation in OMP statements (gfc_next_char_literal, at fortran/scanner.c:701)

2006-11-10 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-11-10 09:46 --- Proposed patch, including a testcase: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-11/msg00293.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759

[Bug fortran/29759] ice on line continuation in OMP statements (gfc_next_char_literal, at fortran/scanner.c:701)

2006-11-09 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-11-10 00:19 --- Proposed patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-11/msg00285.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759

[Bug fortran/29759] New: ice on line continuation in OMP statements (gfc_next_char_literal, at fortran/scanner.c:701)

2006-11-08 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759

[Bug fortran/29671] New: preprocessor statements must start in column 1

2006-10-31 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
Summary: preprocessor statements must start in column 1 Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy

[Bug fortran/29670] New: [meta-bug] fortran interfaces

2006-10-31 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29670

[Bug fortran/29652] New: ambiguous interface declaration undetected

2006-10-30 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
xperimental) -- Summary: ambiguous interface declaration undetected Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug fortran/29629] ICE on OpenMP-enabled program (gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:404)

2006-10-29 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-10-29 11:52 --- Great. Jakub, thank you very much! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29629

[Bug fortran/29629] New: ICE on OpenMP-enabled program (gfc_conv_variable, at fortran/trans-expr.c:404)

2006-10-28 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
n AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29629

[Bug libgomp/26165] Cannot find libgomp.spec after 'make install' on x86_64 and ppc64

2006-10-28 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-10-28 14:27 --- I ran into this on a x86_64 running some flavour of debian. Since I can not alter the system setup, I have to compile svn sources with multilib disabled (otherwise the build process stops due to various errors

[Bug fortran/29606] New: Internal Error: Derived type I/O should have been handled via the frontend

2006-10-26 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug fortran/29267] ICE in operand_subword_force, at emit-rtl.c:1353

2006-10-14 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-10-14 08:46 --- Don't know whether it makes any difference - but if it is the array constructor that crashes because of unequal string lengths within its arguments, why is there no problem with this code? PR

[Bug fortran/29267] ICE in operand_subword_force, at emit-rtl.c:1353

2006-10-13 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-10-13 15:54 --- As requested in comment #7, a testcase for equal string lengths (identical to original PR but to_string() returns CHARACTER(len=255) instead of CHARACTER(len=32)): $> cat cat pr29267.f90 PROGRAM test_

[Bug fortran/29267] ICE in operand_subword_force, at emit-rtl.c:1353

2006-10-07 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-10-07 07:09 --- Tobi, > Actually this is invalid code. The string lengths in the constructor are > different, even though they have to be the same. please try the testcase in the orignal PR with idental string lengt

[Bug fortran/29267] New: ICE in operand_subword_force, at emit-rtl.c:1353

2006-09-28 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29267

[Bug libfortran/29101] New: memory leak in libgfortran

2006-09-15 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
uct: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: franke dot daniel at gmail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29101

[Bug fortran/28974] New: Extremely slow compilation of enumerated DATA statements.

2006-09-07 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
72s -- Summary: Extremely slow compilation of enumerated DATA statements. Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

2006-07-03 Thread franke dot daniel at gmail dot com
--- Comment #23 from franke dot daniel at gmail dot com 2006-07-03 12:14 --- Is the list of missing intrinsics given in comment #7 still valid? I tried to compile F77 code I inherited and got undefined references for itime_ and idate_ (gfortran-4.1.1). If they are still missing, is