https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
--- Comment #8 from Fisnik ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #6)
> If a and b are side-effect-free, pure-boolean expressions then `a && b' and
> `a & b' are completely equivalent and there is no reason to generate
> different code for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
--- Comment #7 from Fisnik ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5)
> > Compiler should not generate the same code, and should listen to the
> > developer, when she/he connects predicates with single `&'. I already wrote
> > that I did ben
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
--- Comment #4 from Fisnik ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> > There should be at least some flag available, such that we can set such a
> > flag and have the compiler generate only a single jump for the method with
> > single amp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
--- Comment #2 from Fisnik ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> > consider the following code snippet (c++):
> >
> > void ampamp(int x, int y) {
> > if (x < 3 && y > 10 )
> > printf("%d%d", x, y);
> > }
> >
> > void amp(int
: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: fkastrati at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
consider the following code snippet (c++):
void ampamp(int x, int y) {
if (x < 3 && y > 10 )
printf("%d%d", x, y);
}
void amp(int x,
