http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
end3er at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.5.0 |4.2.1
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
end3er at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||end3er at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
--- Comment #4 from end3er at gmail dot com 2011-01-28 21:04:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Does -fno-tree-sink fixes the issue?
> >
> > No it does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
--- Comment #2 from end3er at gmail dot com 2010-11-05 17:06:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Does -fno-tree-sink fixes the issue?
No it doesn't. The only flags that works are:
-O0 or
-fno-inline or
-fno-unit-at-a-time or
-fno-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
Summary: Incorrect construction vtable on ARM in case of
diamond shaped virtual inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priorit
