https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
--- Comment #4 from Dalon Work ---
No, I don't think there is more to expect. My mistaken assumption was that the
return value of the function had to be a contiguous array of 8 elements. I
don't find this to be a stupid assumption, since the dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
--- Comment #2 from Dalon Work ---
Thanks for the information. Based on your comments, I've created 2 new
subroutines that call the "bad" function. The first places the result in a
contiguous array, while the second places the result in a stride
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102510
Bug ID: 102510
Summary: Function call has unnecessary aliasing check
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97477
--- Comment #2 from Dalon Work ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> IIRC restrict is not official C++ but I agree it should be accepted.
You are correct, it is not official c++. g++ accepts and uses the '__restrict'
keyword in c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97477
Bug ID: 97477
Summary: g++ doesn't accept __restrict keyword inside array
function parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
