[Bug middle-end/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-27 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 Djordje Baljozovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-06 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #15 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #14) > It's worth keeping in mind: > * Fuzzers are distinct from sanitizers (fuzzers run with random or ~random > input and often use sanitizers to help find issues)

[Bug middle-end/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-06 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #13 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > (In reply to Djordje Baljozovic from comment #11) > > (In reply to Djordje Baljozovic from comment #9) > > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)

[Bug middle-end/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #11 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Djordje Baljozovic from comment #9) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > > A few questions, does `-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=address` report > > anything? Does it work at -

[Bug middle-end/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #10 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Also, if building with GCC 11 works and with GCC 12 doesn't, can you build > two trees, one with either compiler and then bisect first among the shared > l

[Bug middle-end/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #9 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > A few questions, does `-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=address` report > anything? Does it work at -O0 and not just -O3? Does adding > -fno-strict-aliasing

[Bug middle-end/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #6 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ for what we need, we need a > self-contained preprocessed testcase, which you haven't provided. > You should start by c

[Bug c/115345] [12/13/14 REGRESSION] / Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #4 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Djordje Baljozovic from comment #3) > (In reply to Djordje Baljozovic from comment #1) > > I am attaching an example of the differences in gcc_crash_report.txt for the > > input file sid_45

[Bug c/115345] [12/13/14 REGRESSION] / Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #3 from Djordje Baljozovic --- (In reply to Djordje Baljozovic from comment #1) > I am attaching an example of the differences in gcc_crash_report.txt for the > input file sid_453841144.sdf in a separate attachment. See attachment b

[Bug c/115345] [12/13/14 REGRESSION] / Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 --- Comment #2 from Djordje Baljozovic --- Created attachment 58345 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58345&action=edit Example of differences in output

[Bug c/115345] [12/13/14 REGRESSION] / Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 Djordje Baljozovic changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/IUPAC-In

[Bug c/115345] New: [12/13/14 REGRESSION] / Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang

2024-06-04 Thread djordje.baljozovic at ac dot rwth-aachen.de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115345 Bug ID: 115345 Summary: [12/13/14 REGRESSION] / Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n