[Bug sanitizer/86899] [10/11/12/13 regression] TSAN incorrect warning: control reaches end of non-void function

2022-06-25 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86899 --- Comment #11 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r13-1213 PASS for me r13-1164 FAIL for me

[Bug sanitizer/104934] -fsanitize=undefined codegen err

2022-03-15 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > And the bug is? > The S class doesn't have the key method defined, so some other TU needs to > define it and thus provide the vtable and rtti for it. > Wit

[Bug sanitizer/104934] New: -fsanitize=undefined codegen err

2022-03-15 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104934 Bug ID: 104934 Summary: -fsanitize=undefined codegen err Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug analyzer/104863] New: [12 regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889

2022-03-10 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104863 Bug ID: 104863 Summary: [12 regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug sanitizer/90347] [UBSAN] __attribute__((weak))__ results in "declared weak after being used" error

2021-12-03 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90347 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r12-5761 PASS for me r12-5648 FAIL r12-5761 PASS

[Bug middle-end/77721] -Wformat-truncation not uses arg range for converted vars

2021-11-27 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- Sounds like gcc-8.0.1 PASS for me r257061 FAIL r258034 PASS r12-5546 PASS $ ~/arch-gcc/SVN/gcc_258034/bin/gcc --version gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180227 (experimental) [trunk revision 258034] $ ~/arch-gcc/SV

[Bug tree-optimization/102814] New: [12 regression] quadratique/exponential time complexity for max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts

2021-10-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102814 Bug ID: 102814 Summary: [12 regression] quadratique/exponential time complexity for max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/102797] ice in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

2021-10-16 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102797 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r12-4256 PASS r12- FAIL $ cat x.ii struct b { b(int); }; void d() { int c = 1; do try { b a = 1; while (1) { c++; a = 1; } } catch (...) { } w

[Bug middle-end/102386] New: [12 regression] bogus -Wrestrict for unreachable memcpy()

2021-09-17 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102386 Bug ID: 102386 Summary: [12 regression] bogus -Wrestrict for unreachable memcpy() Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug analyzer/96894] Analyzer assumes pointer is NULL, even if pointer was tested to be non-null before

2021-02-14 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96894 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug analyzer/95000] -fanalyzer confused by switch on non-int type

2021-02-11 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95000 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- gcc version 11.0.0 20210210 (experimental) [master revision bd0e37f68a3:deed5164277:72932511053596091ad291539022b51d9f2ba418] PASS for me

[Bug analyzer/94713] Analyzer is buggy on uninitialized pointer

2021-02-11 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94713 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug analyzer/93695] Allocation and freeing memory for array members in loops is not handled properly by the analyzer

2021-02-11 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93695 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug analyzer/99064] New: [11 regression] ICE analyzer::print_mem_ref

2021-02-10 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99064 Bug ID: 99064 Summary: [11 regression] ICE analyzer::print_mem_ref Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyz

[Bug tree-optimization/98568] [11 regression] ICE in verify_gimple() during GIMPLE pass: store-merging

2021-01-06 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98568 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- $ ~/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/home/dimhen/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/dimhen/arch-gcc/r11-6475/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0

[Bug tree-optimization/98568] New: [11 regression] ICE in verify_gimple() during GIMPLE pass: store-merging

2021-01-06 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98568 Bug ID: 98568 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in verify_gimple() during GIMPLE pass: store-merging Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/94195] missing warning reading a smaller object via an lvalue of a larger type

2020-09-26 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94195 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com --- Commen