--- Comment #6 from dennis0yang at gmail dot com 2007-05-12 17:19 ---
Subject: Re: fail to link to static const double
I understand perfectly well everything you said. But I think you miss
the point of this bug report.
This is not about the c++ standard in terms of what should and
--- Comment #4 from dennis0yang at gmail dot com 2007-05-12 09:33 ---
Subject: Re: fail to link to static const double
I just checked out the bug report you mentioned, are you sure they are
the same? When I change "static const double" to "static const int"
--- Comment #3 from dennis0yang at gmail dot com 2007-05-12 09:29 ---
Subject: Re: fail to link to static const double
I understand that the standard only specifies that static const for
integral type can be assigned within the class. My point is that if gcc
decides to allow the
3.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dennis0yang at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31904
