https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #5 from Kochise ---
"The pointer I access is volatile, not the uint32_t behind"
Understand this :
((volatile MyRegDef*) ADDR)->enable; <- TYPO in the original message I couldn't
edit
Not this :
typedef union MyRegDef
{ struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #4 from Kochise ---
The pointer I access is volatile, not the uint32_t behind. Why would I ? The
'volatile' keyword has no meaning to change the data size being processed, only
removing the caching behavior of the compiler.
If the co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89251
--- Comment #2 from Kochise ---
You really considered to tag this issue as RESOLVED INVALID with this "trick" ?
I showed you that just stuffing the uint32_t with unused bits change the
behavior, this is clearly a bug. You cannot be serious. Come
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: david.koch at libertysurf dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
(probably related to #83784)
The setting :
STM32L476 / Cortex-M4
GCC 8.2.1 from ARM
(https://developer.arm.com/open-source/gnu-toolchain/gnu-rm/downloads)
1
