gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #12 from Dave Pagan --- Yes, it did. I had assumed the bug status would get updated, but it wasn't. I'll set it to resolved.

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 --- Comment #15 from Dave Pagan --- Thanks, Paolo! On 06/28/2018 01:44 AM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 > > Paolo Carlini changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 --- Comment #12 from Dave Pagan --- New test pr55976-1.c is failing due to unaccounted for extraneous output from the compiler. Test requires addition of dg-prune-output. Adding the directive and will send patch shortly.

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #9 from Dave Pagan --- P

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 --- Comment #6 from Dave Pagan --- Helpful update, Jonathan - did you want to follow up on this bug then? Or should I go ahead based on your new information?

[Bug c/39808] warn_unused_result fails to produce warning in a statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39808 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/55976] -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #8 from Dave Pagan --- Patch submitted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg00621.html

[Bug c/46921] Lost side effect when struct initializer expression uses comma operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921 --- Comment #4 from Dave Pagan --- Patch submitted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01471.html

[Bug c/46921] Lost side effect when struct initializer expression uses comma operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Dropped side effect with|Lost side effect when |co

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #6 from Dave Pagan --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5) > (In reply to Dave Pagan from comment #4) > > It appears this is a case where ICEs are the result of poor error > > detection/recovery with statement expressions in t

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/46921] Dropped side effect with combination of statement expression and struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/81568] attribute always_inline honored even after attribute noinline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568 --- Comment #5 from Dave Pagan --- Thanks for the update, Martin.

[Bug c/81568] attribute always_inline honored even after attribute noinline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com --- Comment