[Bug fortran/121139] New: rejects selector that is a type-bound function reference invoked on an associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121139 Bug ID: 121139 Summary: rejects selector that is a type-bound function reference invoked on an associate name Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/121060] ICE when argument is associate name created from type-bound operator result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121060 --- Comment #8 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks for the quick fix!

[Bug fortran/121060] New: ICE when argument is associate name created from type-bound operator result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121060 Bug ID: 121060 Summary: ICE when argument is associate name created from type-bound operator result Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/119948] Source allocation of pure function result rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 --- Comment #20 from Damian Rouson --- Should this issue be marked as resolved? If so, can the fix be back ported to the 15 branch?

[Bug fortran/119948] New: Source allocation of pure function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Bug ID: 119948 Summary: Source allocation of pure function result Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortra

[Bug fortran/119380] [12,13,14,15] Free of procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 --- Comment #7 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks, Andre!

[Bug fortran/119380] New: [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with allocatable and procedure pointer components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119380 Bug ID: 119380 Summary: [12,13,14,15] Associate malloc error on selector with allocatable and procedure pointer components Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/119349] New: [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119349 Bug ID: 119349 Summary: [15 Regression] polymorphic array dummy argument with function result actual argument in elemental function Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UN

[Bug fortran/118750] [14/15 Regression] ICE on associate with elemental function with polymorphic array dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118750 --- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson --- Comment on attachment 60396 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60396 Fix for the PR Thanks, Paul!

[Bug fortran/118750] New: [14/15 Regression] ICE on associate with elemental function with polymorphic array actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118750 Bug ID: 118750 Summary: [14/15 Regression] ICE on associate with elemental function with polymorphic array actual argument Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/118747] New: [15 Regression]: seg fault on accessing an elemental procedure dummy argument's deferred-length componeent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118747 Bug ID: 118747 Summary: [15 Regression]: seg fault on accessing an elemental procedure dummy argument's deferred-length componeent Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNC

[Bug fortran/117434] [F08] gfortran rejects actual argument corresponding to procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434 --- Comment #16 from Damian Rouson --- Is there a chance of this fix being backported to the 14 branch? If not, then I assume this issue can be marked as resolved. Unfortunately, however, I'm currently blocked from using 15 by an another issue

[Bug fortran/118724] [F08] Gfortran rejects passing a procedure as an actual argument to a procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118724 --- Comment #5 from Damian Rouson --- Great catch, Jerry! I forgot that I had already reported this in 117434 and I hadn't noticed that Paul committed a fix on November 6. Is there any chance of this being backported to the 14 branch? Unfortuna

[Bug fortran/118724] [F08] Gfortran rejects passing a procedure as an actual argument to a procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118724 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/117434] [F08] gfortran rejects actual argument corresponding to procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434 --- Comment #15 from Damian Rouson --- *** Bug 118724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/118724] New: [F08] Gfortran rejects passing a procedure as an actual argument to a procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118724 Bug ID: 118724 Summary: [F08] Gfortran rejects passing a procedure as an actual argument to a procedure pointer dummy argument Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug fortran/111477] Procedure as actual argument fails against procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111477 --- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson --- Scratch that. I think the code in the original submission _might_ be invalid because it uses an internal subprogram rather than module procedure. So I'll submit a new bug report because I think this one is

[Bug fortran/111477] Procedure as actual argument fails against procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111477 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at archaeologic dot codes --- C

[Bug fortran/117434] New: [F08] gfortran rejects actual argument corresponding to procedure pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117434 Bug ID: 117434 Summary: [F08] gfortran rejects actual argument corresponding to procedure pointer dummy argument Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/116468] New: Segmentation fault at intrinsic assignment to allocatable array component of derived type with kind type parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116468 Bug ID: 116468 Summary: Segmentation fault at intrinsic assignment to allocatable array component of derived type with kind type parameter Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/100650] Passing a derived-type array constructor to the reshape intrinsic gives incorrect results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100650 --- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks, Paul. No urgency. The workaround is simple and painless.

[Bug fortran/100650] Passing a derived-type array constructor to the reshape intrinsic gives incorrect results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100650 --- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson --- Is this related to PR 49324?

[Bug fortran/49324] Deep copy missing for array constructors of DT w/ allocatable components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at archaeologic dot codes --- Co

[Bug fortran/100650] Passing a derived-type array constructor to the reshape intrinsic gives incorrect results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100650 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at archaeologic dot codes --- C

[Bug fortran/107406] New: lock_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107406 Bug ID: 107406 Summary: lock_type Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassign

[Bug fortran/105542] [F03] Orthogonal standard-conforming type finalization tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105542 --- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson --- Thanks for trying this, Jerry. Brad encountered a similar issue, which I think he resolved so I'll I'll ask him to comment here.

[Bug fortran/105542] New: [F03] Orthogonal standard-conforming type finalization tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105542 Bug ID: 105542 Summary: [F03] Orthogonal standard-conforming type finalization tests Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/65347] [F03] Final subroutine not called for function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65347 Damian Rouson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian at archaeologic dot codes --- Co

[Bug fortran/104404] New: Incorrect CFI_cdesc_t "type" member for assumed-type, assumed-rank complex dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104404 Bug ID: 104404 Summary: Incorrect CFI_cdesc_t "type" member for assumed-type, assumed-rank complex dummy arguments Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED