https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
--- Comment #13 from Caroline Tice ---
I'm looking at your patch now; assuming I don't find any problems with it, I
will try to get it committed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910
--- Comment #4 from Caroline Tice ---
Has anyone actually committed this fix? I'm not seeing it in my tree yet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58441
--- Comment #3 from Caroline Tice ---
Could you be a little more specific please? What header are you seeing where?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58374
--- Comment #2 from Caroline Tice ---
Even though I logged in to Bugzilla, I can't seem to edit any of the fields
above, but to the best of my knowledge a patch to fix this problem has been
committed to GCC and this bug should be marked as fixed a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
Caroline Tice changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #8 from Caroline Tice ---
I have added the patch as an attachment, and also submitted it to the
gcc-patches list for review.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #7 from Caroline Tice ---
Created attachment 30752
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30752&action=edit
Reorder two function calls to prevent an ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #6 from Caroline Tice ---
When the preinit flag is used, the vtable verification constructor
initialization function was getting written to the assembly file before
cgraph_process_new_functions was being called (to process the new func
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58300
--- Comment #4 from Caroline Tice ---
I am looking into this now. I will update this bug when I know more.