http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53035
Bug #: 53035
Summary: Internal Compiler Error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compo
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-21 21:35 ---
Subject: Re: problem with the associate statement
Thank you very much. I use the associate construct a great deal; it can really
clarify your code.
Norm
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-21 16:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=21538)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21538&action=view)
code that allow the bug to be reproduced
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45369
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45369
--- Comment #17 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-05 13:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] ICE in
output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4996
Hello,
Your fix worked fine, and I am now again able to build my application. Thanks
again.
Yours truly,
Norm
Norman S
--- Comment #15 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-04 14:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] ICE in
output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4996
You're welcome. Thanks for your help.
Norm
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
=
--- Comment #14
--- Comment #3 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-03 10:24 ---
Subject: Re: [F2003] allocatable character lengths
Thank you very much for replying so promptly. I looked at the status page I
didn't read it carefully enough.
Regards,
Norm Clerman
burnus at gcc dot gn
ED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
print
end program Struct_over
--
Summary: implemention of structure constructor override using a
generic interface
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45155
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-07-26 23:29 ---
Subject: gfortran bug 45092
Hello,
Attached is the file, bug8.tar.gz needed to recreate the problem described in
bug 45092.
Norm Clerman
--- Comment #2 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-07-26 23:29
mponent: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45092
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2009-09-20 23:28 ---
Subject: Re: problem compiling file
Thank you for your response. I would appreciate very much if you could you
please supply me with a web site and the name of the particular version of
binutils.
Thanks for your
are far
longer and more complicated. (Both version 5.2 of the nag compiler and version
11.1 of the Intel compiler are able to successfully compile this file.)
Yours truly,
Norm
Norm Clerman
--
Summary: problem compiling file
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41389
--- Comment #11 from clerman at fuse dot net 2009-08-29 12:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] ICE in
gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.c:3438
You're welcome. Works fine now.
Norm Clerman
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #10
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2009-08-13 20:52 ---
Subject: Bug 41062 has been added to the database
Hello everyone:
gfortran bug 41062.
Attached is a file that will allow you to reproduce bug 41062. Unzip the
file, extract its contents, and invoke shell scipt bug7
compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:54 ---
Subject: Re: problem with contained subprocedure.
Hello,
This appears to be the problem. In any case, I just submitted a new archive
file. I hope this one's correct.
Thanks for your help. Let me know when the fi
--- Comment #6 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=16762)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16762&action=view)
updated, and corrected (I hope) archive
hello,
Sorry for the mixup on the archive. I've attach
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 14:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=16757)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16757&action=view)
archive described in the initial bug report
Pleas see initial bug report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38247
--- Comment #9 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 02:18 ---
Subject: Re: bug6 ambiguous reference
Mikael,
Thank you for responding to this bug report, and please excuse my delay in
replying.
I have rewritten the code in question, and it now works fine.
Thanks to everyone
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 23:22 ---
I have just sent an e-mail in response to your latest one. Attached to it is a
file that will allow you to reproduce the problem.
Thank you for your patience on this matter.
Norm Clerman
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 23:19 ---
Subject: Re: bug6 ambiguous reference
Attached is a file that will allow you to reproduce the problem. Run the shell
script bug6.sh. The error occurs in file mtfmodM.f90:
mtfmodM.f90:2810.17:
end module MTFMod
--- Comment #3 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 16:07 ---
Subject: Re: bug6 ambiguous reference
Hello again,
Thank you for writing.
As I mentioned in my original bug report, I created this particular bug from
my lens design program, which, as you know, contains much more
--- Comment #11 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 14:35 ---
Subject: Re: private/public confusion with a contained
function
Hello,
Thank you for responding so promptly.
Yes, I see what's going on now. It wasn't apparent to me that my function
CreateLine was i
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 13:46 ---
Subject: Re: private/public confusion with a contained
function
Hello,
As best I can see, your reduction of the problem is not correct; in it
subroutine S1 should be private, not public.
Yours truly,
Norm Clerman
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 21:54 ---
Subject: Re: bug5
Thank you for your prompt reply. I have reassembled all the files to reproduce
the problem and they are in the attached file bug5a.tgz.
My apologies for any problem this has caused.
Norm Clerman
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 15:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=16641)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16641&action=view)
see bug explanation
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38066
onent: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38066
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 14:57 ---
Subject: bug 38065 (my bug5)
Attached is the file you will need to reproduce the problem.
Thanks again for your assistance.
Norm Clerman
--- Comment #2 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 14:57
for your attention.
Norm Clerman
--
Summary: bug5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedB
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-09-09 16:03 ---
Subject: bug 37445
Hello,
Attached is a compressed archive containing the files you will need to
reproduce bug 37445. Unpack the file and then invoke the shell script bug4.sh
to accomplish this.
I see that when I
ed at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37445
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-06-21 16:28 ---
Subject: gfortran bug 36590
Hello,
Attached is the zipped tar archive that will enable you to reproduce gfortran
bug 36590.
Unpack the archive in a directory and then invoke file bug3.sh to reproduce
it. If there
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36590
--- Comment #8 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-06-20 20:32 ---
Subject: Re: incorrect error when compiling
Hello,
I'm not sure if I mentioned in my original bug report that I'm downloading
the trunk version for GNU/Linux for 64-bit AMD-compatible processors (x86_64)
--- Comment #2 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-06-12 13:11 ---
Subject: Re: incorrect error when compiling
Hello,
Thank you for your quick reply. Attached is an archive, bug2.tar. Unpack it
and invoke the shell script bug2.sh. You should be able to reproduce the
problem. The file
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36492
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2007-09-22 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: error reported on correct initialization
code.
kargl,
Thanks for your very prompt reply. burnus also replied to my bug
suggesting I try version 4.3.0. I did that, and the bug is not present
--- Comment #3 from clerman at fuse dot net 2007-09-22 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: error reported on correct initialization
code.
burnus,
Thank you for your very prompt reply. I tried version 4.3.0; the bug
does not exist in it.
Using this version I have located a new bug that
ction KIND
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33529
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513
42 matches
Mail list logo
