[Bug middle-end/41357] libgomp build fail

--- Comment #32 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 13:47 --- I'm not sure how (or why) but... I checked out gcc trunk rev. 152325, and the problems seems to have gone away (at least for now). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357

[Bug middle-end/41357] libgomp build fail

--- Comment #30 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 11:10 --- Not sure about the status here... but, on this system: Windows XP Pro/SP3 cygwin Intel Core2 Duo t9...@2.80ghz system with packages: binutils 2.19.51-1 2.19.51.20090704 bison

[Bug ada/41291] New: verify_ssa failed: Error detected around a-direct.adb:1178:4

Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cyg

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #18 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-07-05 17:24 --- As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13, this is fixed, -- christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/40578] FOPEN double defined used in ada/adaint.h:58

--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-07-01 07:02 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Might be safer to rename to GNAT_FOPEN or something like that? FOPEN is likely > to be taken on more than one platform. Which line are you suggesting I test change? I ini

[Bug bootstrap/40578] New: FOPEN double defined used in ada/adaint.h:58

[ada/exit.o] Error 1 -- Summary: FOPEN double defined used in ada/adaint.h:58 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #11 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-24 13:03 --- I have tried binutils cvs checkouts as of 20090608 12:00 UTC 20090519 12:00 UTC 20090502 12:00 UTC 20090402 12:00 UTC 20090309 12:00 UTC as well as cygwin's provided binutils 2.18.50.20080625, all

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #10 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-24 05:56 --- Backing out gcc commit r148408 from gcc trunk , using binutils 2.19.51.20090623 cvs checkout (03:52:32 UTC 2009), for r148850, gets bootstrap to complete. Testresults posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22 17:37 --- The PR was reported using a local build of binutils' daily snapshot of 20090609, and all comments from me was using that version of binutils. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22 17:22 --- Might be related to http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00370.html ... If I strip the here attached a.exe, I get a file that indeed runs... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #7 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22 08:29 --- still there as of revision 148777. The bootstrap failure occurs also when configuring like this: ../gcc/configure --enable-threads=posix --enable-libgcj --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-system-zlib

[Bug bootstrap/40456] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148492

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 12:35 --- Fixed, as far as I understand, with commit r148523, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00503.html. -- christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #6 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 12:23 --- Created an attachment (id=18010) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18010&action=view) a.o: generated with --save-temps -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #5 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 12:22 --- Created an attachment (id=18009) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18009&action=view) a.s: generated with --save-temps -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 12:22 --- Created an attachment (id=18008) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18008&action=view) a.i: generated with --save-temps -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 12:21 --- Created an attachment (id=18007) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18007&action=view) a.exe generated -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16 12:20 --- Created an attachment (id=18006) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18006&action=view) a.c: from conftest in intl -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455

[Bug bootstrap/40456] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148492

-- christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40456

[Bug bootstrap/40456] New: gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148492

does not bootstrap as of commit r148492 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at

[Bug bootstrap/40455] New: gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

-include' '-g' '-O2' '-mtune=generic' /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./prev-gcc/collect2.exe -Bdynamic --dll-search-prefix=cyg /lib/crt0.o /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./prev-gcc/crtbegin.o -L/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./prev-gcc -L/usr/local/i686-pc-cygwin/bin -L/usr/

[Bug ada/37109] can't canadian cross ada (if host=target, but host!=build)

--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-05-13 10:25 --- sorry, I meant gnatbind instead of gnatlib... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37109

[Bug ada/37109] can't canadian cross ada (if host=target, but host!=build)

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-05-13 10:24 --- what is the current situation concerning gnatlib? is that passed explicitly from stage to stage? -- christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/33034] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c & SFset.c: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

--- Comment #6 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-09-08 05:30 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c & SFset.c: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077 > I've seen these in 4.3-based toolchains, but don't see them

[Bug target/33034] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c & SFset.c: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-01-17 11:26 --- This happens still on trunk. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00745.html. A look into the testsuite log file of the gcc tests shows this: Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk

[Bug target/33034] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c & SFset.c: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-01-17 11:23 --- (In reply to comment #1) > For example http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00724.html may > confirm that the problem exists and that it is on --host=--target=--build= > sparc*-*-lin

[Bug target/33034] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c & SFset.c: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

--- Comment #1 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2008-01-17 11:19 --- For example http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg00724.html may confirm that the problem exists and that it is on --host=--target=--build= sparc*-*-linux-gnu. I have asked the poster if he

[Bug c/33034] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/DFcmp.c & SFset.c: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077

gcc.c-torture/unsorted/SIcmp.c, -O0 Executing on host: /usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/ -w -O1 -fno-show-column -c -m64 -o /usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc/SIcmp.o /usr/local/src/branch/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/unsorted/SIcmp.c (timeout =

[Bug c/33033] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/20061124-1.c: undefined reference to `__sync_add_and_fetch_2'

ent: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linu-gnu GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linu-gnu GCC target triplet: sparc64-unknown-linu-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033

[Bug target/31070] [4.1/4.2/4.3] internal compiler error: in function_arg_slotno, at config/sparc/sparc.c:4562 (for 4.1.2), at config/sparc/sparc.c:4605 (for 4.2 RC1), and at config/sparc/sparc.c:461

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-03-21 08:37 --- same thing on 4.2 RC1: Executing on host: /usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ -B/\ usr/local/src/branch/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ -nostdinc++ -I/usr/local/\ src/branch/objdir

[Bug target/31070] internal compiler error: in function_arg_slotno, at config/sparc/sparc.c:4562 (for 4.1.2) and at config/sparc/sparc.c:4619 (for 4.3 revision 122655)

--- Comment #1 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-03-09 07:36 --- One the same computer system, this also happens on trunk, ie. 4.3.0... LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 7 11:15:23 UTC 2007 (revision 122655) Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g

[Bug c++/31070] New: internal compiler error: in function_arg_slotno, at config/sparc/sparc.c:4562

normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31070

[Bug ada/18819] [4.2/4.3 regression] ACATS cdd2a02 fail at runtime

--- Comment #33 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-02-20 13:11 --- (In reply to comment #32) > Created an attachment (id=10984) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10984&action=view) [edit] > Reduced testcase. > any news? -- ht

[Bug middle-end/20548] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault

--- Comment #24 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2007-02-20 13:10 --- (In reply to comment #23) > Patch in the works. > any progress? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548

[Bug libfortran/26893] kinds.h not generated, causing failure

--- Comment #26 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-12-15 09:03 --- I would just like to say that I see this on sparc64-linux too on the 4.2 branch. Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.90 (Aurora Corona)/TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u: binutils-2.17.50.0.3-6.sparc.sparc bison

[Bug testsuite/28870] [4.2/4.3 Regression] configuring, over-riding timeout values in testsuite

--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-11-28 09:17 --- ping any news on this one? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870

[Bug other/29639] [4.3 regression] ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cc execution test

--- Comment #46 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-11-10 09:08 --- (In reply to comment #45) > Created an attachment (id=12575) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12575&action=view) [edit] > Linker fix for !HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP breakage >

[Bug c/27184] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code with pointers to arrays and types and strict aliasing

--- Comment #12 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-08-28 08:12 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Fixed on the mainline, will apply to the branches after a week or so. > So, how's this going for 4.1? -- christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed:

[Bug c/28143] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution FAIL on sparc64

ity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: sparc64-* GCC host triplet: sparc64-* GCC target triplet: sparc64-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28143

[Bug tree-optimization/26797] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 fail

--- Comment #17 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-06-04 08:27 --- just a ping here, is anyone here able to say anything about status of this bug? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26797

[Bug c++/17347] C++ FE produces invalid CONSTRUCTOR trees for vtables

--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06 12:08 --- what's the status of this one? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17347

[Bug other/16513] Libiberty doesn't honor the multi-os-directory settings

--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06 12:07 --- what's the status of this one? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16513

[Bug libgcj/10353] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Java testsuite failures

--- Comment #26 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06 11:30 --- For sparc/sparc64 linux, the status for 4.2 20060503, from here, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-05/msg00223.html, is this: === libjava tests === Running target unix/-m64

[Bug target/25743] crosscompiler fails to build ada-rts for target platform.

--- Comment #5 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06 10:58 --- There may be connections with this PR to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20035 especially the http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8217 which I would suggest be named sparc64 instead

[Bug testsuite/27376] treelang testsuite fails on cygwin

--- Comment #1 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-05-06 10:30 --- hmm, must be the EXEEXT thing -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27376

[Bug libgomp/25865] [4.2 Regression] libgomp incorrectly detects support for TLS

--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-04-24 09:26 --- I understand that this might be affecting SPARC/Linux too, cf., http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-04/msg00448.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25865

[Bug ada/24994] raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access

--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-12-17 12:19 --- I suppose this is what I experience too on sparc/sparc64 linux, see also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00491.html I get this on trunk Sat Dec 17 00:14:08 UTC 2005 (revision 108698): ../../xgcc -B

[Bug bootstrap/25438] New: make: *** No rule to make target `bubblestrap'. Stop.

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438

[Bug target/25176] FAIL: Array_3 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test

--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-12-01 10:06 --- Not 100% sure, but I do believe this has happend on sparc/sparc64 linux for a quite some time... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25176

[Bug target/24428] [4.1 regression] TLS miscompilation on x86_64

--- Comment #7 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-11-16 12:21 --- (In reply to comment #6) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00778.html and for 4.2 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00759.html sorry, that should have been 4.1 a

[Bug target/24428] [4.1 regression] TLS miscompilation on x86_64

--- Comment #6 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-11-16 12:18 --- I may be getting this still for sparc/sparc64 linux, see, e.g., for 4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00778.html and for 4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg00759.html

[Bug ada/20753] ACATS ce3810b segfaults at runtime

--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-11-04 11:24 --- Just a ping here... are there any progress on this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20753

[Bug libstdc++/21554] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution fails

--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-22 11:50 --- (In reply to comment #8) > oops, sorry, present on sparc/sparc64 linux too, see, e.g, > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00927.html hmm, make that sparc64 -- http://gcc.g

[Bug libstdc++/21554] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution fails

--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-22 11:49 --- oops, sorry, present on sparc/sparc64 linux too, see, e.g, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00927.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21554

[Bug objc++/23716] obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm ICE with the GNU runtime

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09 21:00 --- Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23716

[Bug objc++/23616] obj-c++.dg/try-catch-[29].mm (objc exceptions are broken) fails with the GNU Runtime

--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09 21:00 --- Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23616

[Bug objc++/23614] obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm fails with the GNU runtime

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09 21:00 --- Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23614

[Bug testsuite/23613] obj-c++.dg/isa-field-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime

--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09 21:00 --- Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23613

[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime

--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09 20:59 --- Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610

[Bug ada/24003] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL 17 regressions on x86-linux, fixed and decimal arithmetic broken

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/24053] [4.1 Regression] Ada bootstrap ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:795

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-09-29 11:54 --- I'm testing Kenner's suggestion from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00867.html ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24053

[Bug ada/20753] ACATS ce3810b segfault at runtime on hppa-linux

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-09-17 12:08 --- well, LAST_UPDATED: Fri Sep 16 15:58:15 UTC 2005, and on xgcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared

[Bug ada/20753] ACATS ce3810b segfault at runtime on hppa-linux

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-09-16 18:48 --- on 4.0 branch, this passed Aug 13, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00840.html, but failed Sept. 2, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00140.html. checking further

[Bug ada/20753] ACATS ce3810b segfault at runtime on hppa-linux

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-13 07:41 --- So, this is what it looks like now: Test Run By chj on Sat Aug 13 09:36:47 2005 Native configuration is sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu === treelang tests === Schedule of variations

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-10 07:47 --- well, simply applying this to the 4.0 branch did the trick (together with 20604 applied), I get this: LAST_UPDATED: Wed Aug 10 05:32:31 UTC 2005 with http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug treelang/20604] treelang does not get passed -fPIC by default on *-darwin

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-09 19:03 --- well, applied to 4.0, works fine, one FAIL in -m64: === treelang tests === Running target unix/-m64 FAIL: gcc 01 01 rc!=0 === treelang Summary for unix/-m64

[Bug treelang/20604] treelang does not get passed -fPIC by default on *-darwin

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-08 17:53 --- well... the patch applies cleanly still on the 4.0 branch... I sure would love to see this applied there also... unfortunately, I see it does not apply to the 3.4 branch... -- What

[Bug treelang/23061] treelang testsuite fails with -m64

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-08 17:18 --- bugger, it didn't work for the 4.0 branch... this is from the build log file does the patch look correctly applied to you? (SHLIB_LINK=' ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/sparc64-unknown

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-07 05:19 --- oh... and the 3.4 branch too? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-07 05:14 --- I haven't tried this yet... but, could you port back to 4.0 also? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072

[Bug treelang/23061] treelang testsuite fails with -m64

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-07 04:34 --- well, applied it to mainline, no problema caused... however, the bug was reported for the 4.0 branch... applying there "Hunk #1 succeeded at 114 with fuzz 1." will test later today,

[Bug target/20673] C PCH testsuite assembly comparison failure

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-06 13:19 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Subject: Bug 20673 should we change the target milestone to 3.4.5 for this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20673

[Bug fortran/23259] gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 FAIL with Error: Kind -1 not supported for type INTEGER at (1)

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-06 07:38 --- or maybe even a bug with my glibc sorry for the noise... Current directory is /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/gcc/ GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-0.29rh) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation

[Bug fortran/23259] New: gfortran.dg/large_integer_kind_1.f90 FAIL with Error: Kind -1 not supported for type INTEGER at (1)

Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC b

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-05 15:01 --- hmm, a recent run on i686-linux givs me this: PASS: treelang/execute/static.tree execution test testcase /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/treelang/execute/execute.exp co\mpleted in 1 seconds

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-05 12:23 --- BTW, this happens on mainline, 4.0 branch, and also 3.4 branch, see, e.g., http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00196.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-05 12:21 --- Phython, Do you have any idea of this? -- What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug target/19300] [4.0 Regression] PCH failures on sparc-linux

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-08-04 09:46 --- (In reply to comment #24) > Also fixed in 3.4.5. This is the currently, 2005-08-03, latest test results I have for 3.4: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg00196.html and the

[Bug bootstrap/22396] bootstrap of f95 enabled gcc fails because gfortran.1 is missing

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c/23087] Misleading warning, "... differ in signedness"

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/22333] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c34007p c34007r c45282b spurious discriminant CONSTRAINT_ERROR

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug treelang/23061] treelang testsuite fails with -m64

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-07-31 18:48 --- uhm... well, what needs to be added to what then in treelang/Make-lang.in? btw, the 4.0 branch's variant does not differ that much from trunk... there's a toplev.h difference... and a g

[Bug treelang/23061] treelang testsuite fails with -m64

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-07-31 18:28 --- (In reply to comment #1) > $(DRIVER_DEFINES) needs to be added to when compiling spec.c. Would that be done in gcc/Makefile.in or does such a thing belong to gcc/treelang/Make-lang

[Bug treelang/23072] multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-07-27 12:25 --- Same problem on the 3.4 branch... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23072

[Bug treelang/23072] New: multiple runs of treelang testsuite does not work...

at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug treelang/23061] New: treelang testsuite fails with -m64

Product: gcc Version: 4.0.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: treelang AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at

[Bug libgcj/22622] New: gnu/classpath/Configuration.java being grep'ed for before created

ep'ed for before created Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: tromey at redhat dot com ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at

[Bug bootstrap/21704] failure during building 64-bit native compiler by crosscompiler.

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/21547] Enable to build libfortran library

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug ada/21003] Error detected at gnatmake.ads:27:1

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-04-14 04:10 --- hmm... this was probably a false alarm... sorry for any trouble... A fresh build from the 4.0 branch, LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 13 19:45:52 UTC 2005, is a checking right now... -- What

[Bug ada/21003] New: Error detected at gnatmake.ads:27:1

gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com CC: ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: sparc-unkn

[Bug pch/20673] C PCH testsuite assembly comparison failure

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-03-29 07:49 --- This also happens on 4.0 branch, see testreport at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-03/msg01946.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20673

[Bug c/20673] C PCH testsuite assembly comparison failure

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|C PCH assembly comparison |C PCH testsuite assembly |failure |comparison failure http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug c/20673] New: C PCH assembly comparison failure

Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u: binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5.sparc bison-1.875c-2.sparc dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch expect-5.42.1-1.sparc gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc glibc-2.3.3-99.sparc64 glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9 glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc glibc-d

[Bug middle-end/20524] [4.0/4.1 regression] cris-axis-elf testsuite failures: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-1.c and -2

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-03-19 15:37 --- I guess this is related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20553 and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20554 -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/20554] New testsuite fails: error: alias definitions not supported in this configuration

-- What|Removed |Added CC||christian dot joensson at ||gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c/20553] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 on sparc-linux

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-03-19 15:20 --- This also happens on mainline, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-03/msg01267.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20553

[Bug c/20553] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 on sparc-linux

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-03-19 15:18 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] branch]$ /usr/local/src/branch/objdir32/gcc/xgcc -v -save-temps -B/usr/local/src/branch/objdir32/gcc/ -O1 -w -c -o 2009-2.o /usr/local/src/branch/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c

[Bug c/20553] New: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 on sparc-linux

FIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet:

[Bug ada/20035] failed run-time assertion : Tasking not implemented on this configuration on sparc-linux

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-03-06 12:30 --- Laurent Guerby suggested I use this in the gcc/ada/Makefile.in: ifeq ($(strip $(filter-out sparc% linux%,$(arch) $(osys))),) LIBGNAT_TARGET_PAIRS = \ a-intnam.adshttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

  1   2   >