[Bug analyzer/108400] [12/13/14/15 Regression] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive on SoftEtherVPN's src/Cedar/WebUI.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400 --- Comment #7 from Илья Шипицин --- Thank you for fixing this bug! On Thu, Jun 20, 2024, 11:11 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400 > > Richard Biener changed: >

[Bug tree-optimization/106297] [12/13/14/15 Regression] stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic since r12-4725-g88b504b7a8c5affb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297 --- Comment #10 from Илья Шипицин --- Thank you for fixing a bug! On Thu, Jun 20, 2024, 11:08 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297 > > Richard Biener changed: > >

[Bug analyzer/108400] [12/13/14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive on SoftEtherVPN's src/Cedar/WebUI.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400 --- Comment #5 from Илья Шипицин --- quick question, is it going to be fixed in 12.4 ?

[Bug analyzer/108400] [12/13/14 Regression] -Wanalyzer-null-dereference false positive on SoftEtherVPN's src/Cedar/WebUI.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400 --- Comment #4 from Илья Шипицин --- will it be fixed in 12.4 ? пн, 4 мар. 2024 г. в 13:59, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400 > > Richard Biener changed: > >

[Bug analyzer/108400] New: false positive: null dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400 Bug ID: 108400 Summary: false positive: null dereference Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug analyzer/108252] false positive: leak detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108252 --- Comment #7 from Илья Шипицин --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6) > (In reply to Илья Шипицин from comment #5) > > thank you, David! > > > > I'll rerun haproxy check soon > > Note that I haven't yet fixed bug 108251, so I don't

[Bug analyzer/108252] false positive: leak detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108252 --- Comment #5 from Илья Шипицин --- thank you, David! I'll rerun haproxy check soon

[Bug analyzer/108252] New: false positive: leak detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108252 Bug ID: 108252 Summary: false positive: leak detection Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug analyzer/108251] New: false positive: null dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108251 Bug ID: 108251 Summary: false positive: null dereference Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug tree-optimization/106297] stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297 --- Comment #2 from Илья Шипицин --- I have provided repro steps, hope they can be used to find any answer. I tried to add "-save-temps", but it gave another error (not seen without that option): CC src/slz.o In file included from src/s

[Bug c/106297] New: stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297 Bug ID: 106297 Summary: stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug analyzer/106066] crash dump when "-fdump-analyzer" enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106066 --- Comment #1 from Илья Шипицин --- another crash using "-fanalyzer-verbose-state-changes" stacktrace during IPA pass: analyzer src/ssl_crtlist.c:523:17: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 523 | entry = crtlist_ent

[Bug analyzer/106066] New: crash dump when "-fdump-analyzer" enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106066 Bug ID: 106066 Summary: crash dump when "-fdump-analyzer" enabled Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyz

[Bug gcov-profile/102746] gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746 --- Comment #9 from Илья Шипицин --- ok, so we'll migrate to gcc-12 :)

[Bug gcov-profile/102746] gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746 --- Comment #7 from Илья Шипицин --- wow. thanks for that. btw, will it be "gcc-12 only" or it is going to be backported (I'm interested in gcc-8) ?

[Bug gcov-profile/102746] gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746 --- Comment #3 from Илья Шипицин --- > The question is if we should return 1 if we can't open .gcda (or .gcno) file > for one input file, or for all of them? any input file.

[Bug gcov-profile/102746] gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746 --- Comment #2 from Илья Шипицин --- I came to this situation using wrong powershell approach. I found all "gcda" and merged them into single string. Powershell executed "gcov" and passed 1 (!!) argument as concatenated string. Actually, if gco

[Bug gcov-profile/102747] New: gcov returns 0 when invoked on gcda generated by previous gcc version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102747 Bug ID: 102747 Summary: gcov returns 0 when invoked on gcda generated by previous gcc version Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/102746] New: gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746 Bug ID: 102746 Summary: gcov returns 0 un erroneuos incovation Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-prof