[Bug target/111645] Intrinsics vec_sldb /vec_srdb fail with __vector unsigned __int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111645 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/111645] Intrinsics vec_sldb /vec_srdb fail with __vector unsigned __int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111645 --- Comment #7 from Carl Love --- Patch committed that add the signed __int128 and unsigned __int128 argument types for the overloaded built-ins vec_sld, vec_sldb, vec_sldw, vec_sll, vec_slo, vec_srdb, vec_srl, vec_sr0 built-ins was committed:

[Bug target/115466] rs6000 vec_ld built-in works on BE but not LE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115466 --- Comment #6 from Carl Love --- comment 5, Segher Yes, I have some PVIPR changes that we have talked about previously. I will create a patch to also make the changes discussed here.

[Bug target/115466] rs6000 vec_ld built-in works on BE but not LE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115466 --- Comment #4 from Carl Love --- comment 1 Yes, I can confirm if I add the alignment statement to the declarations it works fine. I originally tried to use the built-in as part of a re-write of a function in the Milvus AI source code. The

[Bug target/115466] New: rs6000 vec_ld built-in works on BE but not LE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115466 Bug ID: 115466 Summary: rs6000 vec_ld built-in works on BE but not LE Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ta

[Bug target/113950] New: PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113950 Bug ID: 113950 Summary: PowerPC, ICE with -O1 or higher compiling __builtin_vsx_splat_2di test case Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/111645] Intrinsics vec_sldb /vec_srdb fail with __vector unsigned __int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111645 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug target/108396] [12/13 Regression] PPCLE: vec_vsubcuq missing since r12-5752-gd08236359eb229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108396 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 fro

[Bug target/93448] PPC: missing builtin for DFP quantize(dqua,dquai,dquaq,dquaiq)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93448 --- Comment #8 from Carl Love --- Status updated to resolved, fixed.

[Bug target/93448] PPC: missing builtin for DFP quantize(dqua,dquai,dquaq,dquaiq)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93448 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/100930] PPC: Missing builtins for P9 vextsb2w, vextsb2w, vextsb2d, vextsh2d, vextsw2d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100930 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug target/102169] powerpc64 int memory operations using FP instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102169 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug target/93449] PPC: Missing conversion builtin from vector to _Decimal128 and vice versa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93449 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---