[Bug c/63336] cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/60198] ICE with _Cilk_spawn in expression within template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/60082] Certain Cilk keywords executable Hanging for -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60082 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug c++/60082] New: Certain Cilk keywords executable Hanging for -O1

: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bviyer at gmail dot com The following two Cilk Plus tests is timing out at -O1 in my x86_64 box (-O2, -O3 and -O0 works fine). These tests were working fine till revision r207047. Some check-in between r207047 and r207437

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #9 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Bernd and H. J., The catch_exc.cc bug is a different issue. It is failing in most 32 bit machines and we are currently looking into it. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #6 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Jeff, Andrew and Bernd, Can you please try out the "possible fix" and see if that works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Created attachment 31938 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31938&action=edit Possible Fix. Possible fix.

[Bug target/59691] cilk-plus run failures on non-sse processors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59691 --- Comment #2 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hello Bernd, I don't have a pentium 2 machine readily available. Can you try this patch and see if it works for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. diff --git a/libcilkrts/runtime/config/x86/os-unix-sysdep.c

[Bug other/59384] Cilk Plus array notation with for loop after segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #16 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Jakub, Honestly, I don't know why the changes were done in aclocal.m4. I added the change to configure.ac and then did the following commands: autoreconf --force --verbose automake --add-missing --ve

[Bug other/59834] [4.9 Regression] g++.dg/cilk-plus/CK/catch_exc.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59834 --- Comment #1 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi H. J., I am not able to reproduce it in my SUSE machine. I tried both -m64 and -m32. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #10 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Paul and Jakub, I have attached a patch above (called "Possible Fix"). Does it work for you? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #9 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Created attachment 31847 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31847&action=edit Possible fix

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 --- Comment #4 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Jakub, __cpu_set_t_defined is defined in /usr/include/bits/sched.h in my SUSE machine and in Ubuntu machine. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug other/58996] [4.9 regression] build failure in libcilkrts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58996 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug other/59384] Cilk Plus array notation with for loop after segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384 --- Comment #1 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Nick, I am sorry for taking a while to get back to you. As you can tell from gcc-patches mailing list, we are actively pursuing to try and push Cilk Plus into trunk. We have submitted a updated patch

[Bug bootstrap/59094] [4.9 Regression] Cilk runtime library headers are installed into the general include directory

|Added > > > CC||bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org > , > | |bviyer at gmail dot com > > --- Comment #1 from Dmitr

[Bug bootstrap/58951] [4.9 regression] cilk build fails due to use of -ldl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58951 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug bootstrap/58925] --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs breaks libcilk install

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925 --- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi, I just submitted a patch to the gcc-patches mailing list. Can you try that out? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:02 PM, octoploid at yandex dot com < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrot

[Bug c/58683] Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling Cilk Plus code with -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58683 --- Comment #2 from Balaji V. Iyer --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Doesn't compile on trunk. Yes, this shouldn't compile in trunk because this feature is not implemented in it yet. It is an issue in Cilk Plus branch and I am on

[Bug regression/57766] [4.9 Regression]: gcc.sum c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/sec_implicit_ex.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57766 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug testsuite/57687] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/comma_exp.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug c/57692] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57692 --- Comment #4 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hello Dominique and Steve, On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:24 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57692 > > Dominique d'Humieres chang

[Bug c/57692] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/gather_scatter.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57692 --- Comment #3 from Balaji V. Iyer --- [sorry, I accidentally hit the send...let's try this again...] Hello Dominique & Steve, From what I can tell, this looks like a stack overflow issue. When I try this change below, it seem to work fine. T

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #4 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hello, This issue should be fixed in trunk revision 199837. Please let me know otherwise. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #3 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hello, This issue should be fixed in trunk revision 199837. Please let me know otherwise. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug c/57452] FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/AN/if_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57452 --- Comment #3 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi H. J., Yes, there is a bug in this test case. I have fixed it and it was approved for trunk and is already checked in. To answer your 2nd question, the compiler cannot check for out of bounds erro

[Bug c++/53672] gcc/branches/cilkplus does not like C++ spawn (when optimized)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672 --- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer 2012-06-15 19:46:13 UTC --- Hello John, The revision mentioned above should fix this problem. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer.

[Bug c++/53672] gcc/branches/cilkplus does not like C++ spawn (when optimized)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672 Balaji V. Iyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bviyer at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/47791] New: finish function is using absolute value instead of the #defined one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47791 Summary: finish function is using absolute value instead of the #defined one Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3