https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #8 from Brad Spencer ---
Everything you've said makes sense to me. The proposed documentation changes
would help a lot. IMO, they are a good idea and would have helped (and will
continue to help) me.
I agree that the C++11/14/17 st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #3 from Brad Spencer ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> C++17 support isn't stable until GCC 9 so there is no guarantee of
> compatibility between 7 and 8 or 8 and 9. That applies to the entire library
> (and language
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
Bug ID: 99058
Summary: Consider adding a note about std::optional ABI break
to the C++17 status table
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
