https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #8 from Brad Spencer ---
Everything you've said makes sense to me. The proposed documentation changes
would help a lot. IMO, they are a good idea and would have helped (and will
continue to help) me.
I agree that the C++11/14/17 st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #3 from Brad Spencer ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> C++17 support isn't stable until GCC 9 so there is no guarantee of
> compatibility between 7 and 8 or 8 and 9. That applies to the entire library
> (and language
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bspencer at blackberry dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In this table
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2017
the row labelled
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bspencer at blackberry dot com
Created attachment 33006
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33006&action=edit
Test program demonstrat
