https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118377
--- Comment #9 from Tejas Belagod ---
I agree it's best to have feature-parity with Clang and a widening divide is
better than rejecting it outright.
Technically, as this is not a regression, can we fix this to sorry more
gracefully for GCC15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118377
--- Comment #7 from Tejas Belagod ---
Sorry for the delay in replying. Though variable-length(VLA) SVE vector types
behave as GNU vectors for C/C++ operator semantics, there is currently no
support for decomposing them into scalar operation sequ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114108
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114108
--- Comment #9 from Tejas Belagod ---
This seems to be the issue:
... VECITYPE is the vector form of PATTERN_STMT's result type. */
static gimple *
vect_convert_output (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info, tree type,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114108
--- Comment #8 from Tejas Belagod ---
I find this transformation a bit odd:
...
pr114108.c:11:21: note: add new stmt: vect_patt_32.15_181 = .ABD
(vect__3.11_177, vect__7.14_180);
pr114108.c:11:21: note: -->vectorizing statement: patt_31 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112577
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
--- Comment #1 from Tejas Belagod ---
Testing a fix as we speak..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |belagod at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
Bug ID: 113780
Summary: [ARM] Incorrect indirect tailcall generated for
PAC-enabled function.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112375
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112375
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112577
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112577
--- Comment #1 from Tejas Belagod ---
Confirmed. Testing a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112577
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96339
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106339
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96339
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod ---
> Are you still working on this PR ? If not, can I assign it to myself ?
Yes I am - its almost done - just been busy with a few higher priority things.
I'll find some time to clean it up, test it and post it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101845
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101543
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101543
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod ---
> .. but still doesn't generate 'vector code' for the example shown here.
Actually, it does. I was looking in the wrong place.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101428
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96339
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96339
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
29 matches
Mail list logo
