http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #6 from Arsham Skrenes ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
> > Also, is there a directive that I can use to explicitly tell GCC
> > to not remove a loop (without having to resort to a compiler flag
> > which is glo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
Arsham Skrenes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59538
--- Comment #4 from Arsham Skrenes ---
Can I suggest then that GCC outputs a compiler warning when it removes a loop?
It outputs warnings for unused variables as well as implicit casting, so why
not have a warning for removing loops?
Also, is the
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: arsham at skrenes dot com
Created attachment 31462
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31462&action=edit
Small prime number calculating program that shows bug
I'm