https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114830
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 58021
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58021&action=edit
c++filt crash binaries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114830
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 58020
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58020&action=edit
asan report summary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114830
Bug ID: 114830
Summary: c++filt stack overflows in rust demangler
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: dem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113652
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|amodra at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109308
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108727
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, looks good to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108315
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108147
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97361
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7)
> '-fpatchable-function-entry=N[,M]'
> Generate N NOPs right at the beginning of each function, with the
> function entry point before the Mth NOP.
Bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
So, similar code to what we have in rs6000_call_aix to handle
if ((INTVAL (cookie) & CALL_LONG) != 0
&& GET_CODE (func_desc) == SYMBOL_REF)
should be added to rs6000_sibcall_aix, I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
I'm sorry, I forgot exactly what was happening when I talked about this on the
call. What I should have said is that -mlongcall code is correct but is
missing a sibcall optimisation. -fno-plt code (after remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039
Bug ID: 105039
Summary: rust demangler stack overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Do check that the result is not a direct call. I think I was wrong to say the
assert could be removed (or modified as you have done).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104671
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
I have spent some time over the last few days digging into history relevant to
this bug as part of looking into a binutils report that an ARCH=powerpc
CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- pmac32_defconfig linux kernel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95126
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103893
Bug ID: 103893
Summary: ada demangler heap overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #14)
> It would be a way to keep the data in memory(.rodata) through adjusting the
> cost of constant.
Yes, I posted a series of patches that fix this problem and other rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103197
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102867
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Not that I'm really complaining about this, note also that the error message
referencing "filedata->section_headers + (sizetype)((long unsigned int)i * 80)"
is a little bit too much of compiler internal represe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102867
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 51641
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51641&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102867
Bug ID: 102867
Summary: Waddress complaint in readelf.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102132
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102130
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46981
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> The -Warray-bounds for section.c is gone
Thanks for fixing that.
> but last night's build still shows
> a large number of -Warray-bounds instances as well as other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101977
Bug ID: 101977
Summary: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101810
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Making SYMESZ a size_t as the patch does, is a complete fix if the code is only
compiled for 64-bit hosts where unsigned int is smaller than size_t. If
compiled for 32-bit then the expression calculating buffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99759
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101810
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 51272
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51272&action=edit
Proposed fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101810
Bug ID: 101810
Summary: libiberty/simple-object-xcoff.c segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
Preserving certain -m gas options goes back to this patch:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2008-January/054935.html
Given the number of ppc micros around with differing functional units, it is
quite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61032
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|amodra at gmail dot com|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94393
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc |powerpc64le
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #14 from Alan Modra ---
-fpatchable-function-entry isn't used by the powerpc linux kernel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 50039
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50039&action=edit
ELFv1 support
Revised patches. I wasn't happy with the use of a ".text" symbol in the
previous patch since some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49701|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|MOVED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
Bug ID: 98210
Summary: SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49701
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49701&action=edit
fix powerpc64 -fpatchable-function-entry
This makes -fpatchable-function-entry do something sensible on powerpc64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5)
> So the "o" flag symbol is one in the .opd section, rather than what would be
> correct here, .L._Z3foov.
Actually, that breakage happened recently with commit 694d4a6d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93176
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97267
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Here's elf32-arc.i creduced.
a;
b();
c() {
void *d;
if (d == b && e())
d = a;
return d;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49347
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49347&action=edit
original .i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 49346
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49346&action=edit
reduced testcase
-mcpu=power10 -O2 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97361
Bug ID: 97361
Summary: power10 unrecognizable insn
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Bug ID: 97360
Summary: ICE in range_on_exit
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92564
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97267
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97267
Bug ID: 97267
Summary: Missed tail calls on ppc64 ELFv2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97166
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97107
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target|powerpc*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97166
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot
64 matches
Mail list logo
