[Bug c++/115844] [14 Regression] Invalid diagnostics for correctly-rejected non-consteval call in consteval function called in a regular lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115844 --- Comment #2 from Ali Mohammad Pur Fard --- > clang gives the same error message Then perhaps their diagnostic is also not the best. > See https://wg21.link/p2564 >From my interpretation of their given rules, this lambda should not qualify:

[Bug c++/115844] New: [14 Regression] Invalid diagnostics for correctly-rejected non-consteval call in consteval function called in a regular lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115844 Bug ID: 115844 Summary: [14 Regression] Invalid diagnostics for correctly-rejected non-consteval call in consteval function called in a regular lambda Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/110508] [14 Regression] ICE (Segfault) during widening_mul, in match_uaddc_usubc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110508 --- Comment #4 from Ali Mohammad Pur Fard --- Can confirm that the patch () fixes the original reproducer.

[Bug c++/110508] ICE (Segfault) during widening_mul, in match_uaddc_usubc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110508 --- Comment #1 from Ali Mohammad Pur Fard --- Created attachment 55438 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55438&action=edit Reduced source

[Bug c++/110508] New: ICE (Segfault) during widening_mul, in match_uaddc_usubc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110508 Bug ID: 110508 Summary: ICE (Segfault) during widening_mul, in match_uaddc_usubc Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/109683] [13/14 Regression] False cyclic dependency error reported for constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109683 Ali Mohammad Pur Fard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ali.mpfard at gmail dot com ---