[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #23 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes --- Created attachment 58642 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58642&action=edit My latest gcc tls support patch

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 --- Comment #22 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes --- (In reply to Julian Waters from comment #19) > > Alexandre, how's your progress on Windows TLS going? Could we collaborate to > get this into gcc somehow? Hi Julian, I used to manage a collect

[Bug target/80881] Implement Windows native TLS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881 Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail dot

[Bug target/83562] broken destructors of thread_local objects on i686 mingw targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83562 Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail dot

[Bug target/78936] Interprocedural constant propagation miscompiles C++ methods on i686 Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78936 Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail dot

[Bug target/63206] New: Gcc 4.9.1 Generated code needlessly stacks r3

Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: alexandre.nunes at gmail dot com Created attachment 33459 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33459&action=edit testcase when compiling the following testcase code: #include #include

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail

[Bug target/38203] attribute `noreturn' isn't effective when -mthumb param is active

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38203 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes 2011-02-28 20:30:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > There's a lot of debate about whether the ARM behaviour is a good thing or > not. > Not pushing the return address means that the debugger cannot

[Bug target/47685] Tail call doesn't work for thumb2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47685 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes 2011-02-28 20:27:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > This has been fixed on trunk and will be in the 4.6.0 release. > > With this commit > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05/msg00725.html > >

[Bug target/47685] Tail call doesn't work for thumb2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47685 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes 2011-02-28 20:25:50 UTC --- Created attachment 23496 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23496 Patch from the trunk, which I'm testing against 4.5.x

[Bug c/47685] Tail call doesn't work for thumb2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47685 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Pereira Nunes 2011-02-10 18:30:48 UTC --- It also happens on 4.4.5

[Bug c/47685] New: Tail call doesn't work for thumb2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47685 Summary: Tail call doesn't work for thumb2 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o