https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #13 from Adam Conrad ---
(In reply to Javier Serrano Polo from comment #12)
>
> Multiarch interpreter names are officially supported in Debian.
No. No they're not. I don't think "officially" means what you think it means.
I've as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #7 from Adam Conrad ---
(In reply to Javier Serrano Polo from comment #6)
>
> > the discussion about names is probably more appropriate on the libc side
>
> Adam, do you agree?
I agree with this statement, sure. But I don't agree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #5 from Adam Conrad ---
(In reply to Javier Serrano Polo from comment #1)
> Adam, if you had to come up with multiarch interpreter names for traditional
> architectures, which would be the proper place to discuss?
As Andrew says, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66368
Adam Conrad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adconrad at 0c3 dot net
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670
Adam Conrad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adconrad at 0c3 dot net
--- Comment #9
