Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: adam at irvine dot com
Created attachment 30171
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30171&action=edit
source code
RM 7.3(10.1) makes it clear that if you declare a private extension that has
the LIMITED
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: adam at irvine dot com
Created attachment 30170
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30170&action=edit
source code
Inside a generic, GNAT incorrectly ac
--- Comment #4 from adam at irvine dot com 2010-01-08 00:46 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> From what I understand:
> - "access T1" is an access_definition and thus a general access type (RM
> 3.10(12/2))
> - "Y'Access" is of the type of its cont
--- Comment #2 from adam at irvine dot com 2008-03-07 00:08 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > but others are
> actual bugs in which the compiler is generating incorrect instructions
> (such as #12331);
>
> That is not incorrect instructions. Just different than what y
erity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: adam at irvine dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35489
