[Bug c++/20207] null constructor not needed in multiple inheritance

2005-03-01 Thread Serge dot Iovleff at univ-lille1 dot fr
--- Additional Comments From Serge dot Iovleff at univ-lille1 dot fr 2005-03-01 11:16 --- (In reply to comment #3) > it is invalid to use A0 in the base constructor list of D, because A0 is not a > virtual base for D. .it doesn't matter that the inheritance A->A0 is decl

[Bug c++/20207] null constructor not needed in multiple inheritance

2005-02-25 Thread Serge dot Iovleff at univ-lille1 dot fr
--- Additional Comments From Serge dot Iovleff at univ-lille1 dot fr 2005-02-25 15:43 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think this is invalid code but I don't know how to produce it right now. Yes you can add an explicit call to the constructor of A0 in B and C, in this case t

[Bug c++/20207] New: null constructor not needed in multiple inheritance

2005-02-25 Thread Serge dot Iovleff at univ-lille1 dot fr
Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: Serge dot Iovleff at univ-lille1 dot fr CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20207