Warnings generated during a failed avr target build of 4.0 as of today, on a
mac/dwawin-7.6 host which should likely be verified as being harmless, and
then silenced if so. (sending the report just in case the build failure may
be related to one of the more ominous warnings, and for reference: buil
> --- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06
> Look at the routines we implement in libgcc and ask again. We never did
> implement sub-word routines.
Which is an interesting point, but wouldn't it be more ideal to define
default built-in's for each of a target's defin
> Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-17
> Here is a bug which says the oposite should be done (as arguments are
> already > done): PR 15484.
Unless I misunderstand; C's promotion/evaluation semantics need not
be literally applied, but must only yield equivalent result
