--- Comment #11 from Lulin dot Song at gmail dot com 2010-09-01 15:29
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > when the return value is character string, is it more intuitive to be
> >
> > requestdouble ( real(kind=8) & rlat, real(kind=8)
--- Comment #9 from Lulin dot Song at gmail dot com 2010-09-01 14:22
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Main program is written in C. (see the following)
>
> I strongly suggest using the C Binding facility of Fortran 2003 instead of
> relyin
--- Comment #5 from Lulin dot Song at gmail dot com 2010-08-31 18:06
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Try compiling with -fdump-tree-original and inspecting the
> expected argument lists. You really don't want to use a
> function here. Use a subroutine.
>
>
--- Comment #4 from Lulin dot Song at gmail dot com 2010-08-31 18:02
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think the return value for character(16) returns are passed via the first
> argument. So I think this is invalid.
>
If the return value of function 'requestdouble
aracter string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Lulin dot Song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45466
