[Bug c++/115159] internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.cc:1206 when using modules and QCoreApplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159 --- Comment #2 from Michał Walenciak --- Created attachment 58248 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58248&action=edit preprocessed project files main.cpp compiled with -freport-bug (ccnR6WAp.out file) plus preprocessed file w

[Bug c++/115159] New: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.cc:1206 when using modules and QCoreApplication

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: Kicer86 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- When compiling a simple cpp file with #include and modules enabled gcc

[Bug target/48817] New: [avr] gcc does not build (error: format not a string literal and no format arguments)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48817 Summary: [avr] gcc does not build (error: format not a string literal and no format arguments) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/47675] [avr] problems with asm when all registers on clobber list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47675 --- Comment #2 from Michał Walenciak 2011-02-10 11:37:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Don't use clobbers then but save/restore the registers yourself. You can't > obviously take away all regs from GCC. Eventually this should be diagnosed

[Bug c++/47675] New: [avr] problems with asm when all registers on clobber list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47675 Summary: [avr] problems with asm when all registers on clobber list Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/47658] -Os generates bigger code than -O2/3 for many small inline functions (objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658 --- Comment #4 from Michał Walenciak 2011-02-09 21:00:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > It works for me, > > > > what do you mean by "works" ?:) > > works as "expected" ;) At -Os

[Bug c++/47658] -Os generates bigger code than -O2/3 for many small inline functions (objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658 --- Comment #2 from Michał Walenciak 2011-02-09 19:34:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > It works for me, what do you mean by "works" ?:) > the abstraction is completely eliminated by early inlining. > At -Os we do not inline E::foo2 into E

[Bug c++/47658] New: -Os generates bigger code than -O2/3 for many small inline functions (objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658 Summary: -Os generates bigger code than -O2/3 for many small inline functions (objects) Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/43745] [avr] g++ puts VTABLES in SRAM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745 Michał Walenciak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Kicer86 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/34734] attribute((progmem)) not handled properly in C++ for AVRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34734 Michał Walenciak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Kicer86 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/46426] [avr] avr/libgcc.S in SVN r166596 fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46426 Michal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Kicer86 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from