https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115644
--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
This crash seems to be the same cause: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/6br3xoaKG
The testing program:
```
void f()
{
int p;
unsigned v;
v = (~0u) >> p;
int p[1] = p;
}
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115646
Bug ID: 115646
Summary: [gcc][trunk] ICE in gen_conditions_for_pow_int_base,
at tree-call-cdce.cc:587
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115644
Bug ID: 115644
Summary: [gcc][trunk] ICE if redeclare a variable with
different type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115642
Bug ID: 115642
Summary: [gcc][trunk] internal compiler error: tree check:
expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark)
in c_expr_sizeof_expr
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115641
Bug ID: 115641
Summary: GCC crashes on function has attribute
`__attribute__((const))`
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
--- Comment #5 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> I believe the second form is still incorrect and it just works by luck. To
> ensure it work you have to do:
>
> asm("mov %1,%0":"=r"(n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114598
wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114598
Bug ID: 114598
Summary: [GCC-14] Miscompilation of `#pragma omp parallel for`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
--- Comment #3 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
Thanks a lot, I have checked it out.
I'm still somewhat confused. Does the difference in compilation stem from GCC
interpreting "=m" and "=r" differently, leading it to assume t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Bug ID: 114597
Summary: [GCC-14] Miscompilation of pointer assignment with
inline assembly
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114205
Bug ID: 114205
Summary: Miscompilation: the use of __builtin_object_size cause
asan failure.
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114203
Bug ID: 114203
Summary: Miscompilation: A possible miscompilation in GCC 13
and 14 with option -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112512
Bug ID: 112512
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1861
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112511
Bug ID: 112511
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
type_contains_placeholder_1, at tree.cc:4243
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112509
Bug ID: 112509
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in verify_range, at
value-range.cc:1132
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112505
Bug ID: 112505
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
build_vector_from_val, at tree.cc:2104
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112504
Bug ID: 112504
Summary: gcc: 14: internal compiler error: in operand_equal_p,
at fold-const.cc:3313
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112503
Bug ID: 112503
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
at gsi_start_edge(edge_def*)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112502
Bug ID: 112502
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
get_predictor_value, at predict.cc:2695
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112501
Bug ID: 112501
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
recog.cc:2804
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112500
Bug ID: 112500
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in expand_asm_stmt,
at cfgexpand.cc:3419
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112499
Bug ID: 112499
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: output_operand:
invalid expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112496
Bug ID: 112496
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
vectorizable_nonlinear_induction, at
tree-vect-loop.cc:9573
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112495
--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
Correction: It should be -O3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112495
Bug ID: 112495
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112494
Bug ID: 112494
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in ix86_cc_mode, at
config/i386/i386.cc:16477
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112493
Bug ID: 112493
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.cc:2421
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112489
Bug ID: 112489
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112488
Bug ID: 112488
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in make_ssa_name_fn,
at tree-ssanames.cc:354
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112486
wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112487
Bug ID: 112487
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
setup_one_parameter, at tree-inline.cc:3565
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112486
Bug ID: 112486
Summary: GCC: 14: hangs with always_inline
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111922
--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
Compiler Explorer: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/EoPGKa9r8
The link above seems broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111922
Bug ID: 111922
Summary: GCC: internal compiler error: in decompose, at
wide-int.h:1049
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111921
Bug ID: 111921
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111915
Bug ID: 111915
Summary: GCC: ICEs on a program with __restrict and option `-O2
-fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-ccp`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111914
Bug ID: 111914
Summary: GCC: 14: ICE when function pointer array as arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111913
Bug ID: 111913
Summary: GCC: 14: -O1 compile __builtin_popcount fails while
-O0 succeeds
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111912
Bug ID: 111912
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compile error when apply
__transaction_atomic on logical or expr
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111911
Bug ID: 111911
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: internal compiler
error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:17510
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111887
--- Comment #2 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
Thanks for you reply, I got it!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111887
Bug ID: 111887
Summary: GCC: 14: A potential miscompilation with __builtin_inf
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111886
Bug ID: 111886
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in tree_to_uhwi, at
tree.cc:6467
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111882
Bug ID: 111882
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in
get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.cc:940
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111865
Bug ID: 111865
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: symtab_node::verify
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111862
Bug ID: 111862
Summary: GCC: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
c_parser_omp_clause_reduction, at c/c-parser.cc:16234
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111856
Bug ID: 111856
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in as_a, at
machmode.h:381
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111855
Bug ID: 111855
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:265
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111834
Bug ID: 111834
Summary: GCC: 14: out of memory when __builtin_return_address
receive a large constant
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111833
--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
The compiler explore link above is broken, here is the link:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/779zzjcze
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111833
Bug ID: 111833
Summary: GCC: 14: hangs on a simple for loop
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111821
Bug ID: 111821
Summary: GCC: 14: continue to consume memory until OOM
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111820
Bug ID: 111820
Summary: GCC: 14: hangs with a simple while loop
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111819
Bug ID: 111819
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in fold_offsetof, at
c-family/c-common.cc:6877
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111818
Bug ID: 111818
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have
'integer_cst' in tree_could_trap_p, at tree-eh.cc:2733
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111817
Bug ID: 111817
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in expand_asm_stmt,
at cfgexpand.cc:3389
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111816
Bug ID: 111816
Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
at c_parser_parse_gimple_body
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111810
Bug ID: 111810
Summary: GCC-14 segfault: error: expected declaration or
statement at end of input
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111809
--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
Full stack backtrace:
: In function 'bar':
:8:1: error: SSA name '' with version 3 has no definition
8 | }
| ^
At top level:
cc1: internal compiler error: in release_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111809
Bug ID: 111809
Summary: GCC-14: internal error, internal compiler error: in
release_function_body, at cgraph.cc:1805
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110737
Bug ID: 110737
Summary: GCC: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when
processing __builtin_isinf and _Atomic long double
together
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110736
--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
It looks like this is similar to bug 110667, but ICEs under different
optimization option (-Ofast with -Os).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110736
Bug ID: 110736
Summary: gcc: internal compiler error: in change_stack, at
reg-stack.cc:2709
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110699
Bug ID: 110699
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
array_type, have error_mark in array_ref_low_bound, at
tree.cc:12754
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110693
Bug ID: 110693
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110682
Bug ID: 110682
Summary: GCC, ICE: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr,
at gimplify.cc:16771
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110667
Bug ID: 110667
Summary: gcc-14, ICE: internal compiler error: in replace_reg,
at reg-stack.cc:722
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110603
Bug ID: 110603
Summary: GCC, ICE: internal compiler error: in verify_range, at
value-range.cc:1104
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110575
Bug ID: 110575
Summary: gcc: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
build_aligned_type
Product: gcc
Versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110500
Bug ID: 110500
Summary: gcc: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
c_parser_omp_clause_allocate
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96365
wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110154
wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110154
Bug ID: 110154
Summary: When compiling __builtin_frame_address with a
relatively large argument, GCC-trunk takes up a
significant amount of time.
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109917
--- Comment #2 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Dup of bug 109520.
>
> Where is this code located anyways?
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109520 ***
Tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109917
Bug ID: 109917
Summary: gcctk hangs at -O0 but normally terminates at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109842
Bug ID: 109842
Summary: GCC-12 hangs on simple piece of inline assembly code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104983
Bug ID: 104983
Summary: gcc ignore side effect inside CommaExpr and failed to
update value variable's value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
77 matches
Mail list logo