https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99179
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see it failing in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-August/856338.html .
Did this get fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117799
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117393
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93265
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blubban at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117799
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90663
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Teylu ---
(In reply to Mark Harmstone from comment #18)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #17)
> > > As Eric said, the problem is essentially that CodeView isn't designed to
> > > accommodate Ada's type system
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121355
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 62246
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62246&action=edit
Patch which I will test
I still need some testcases though. But it gets the one in comment #0
correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121355
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #50 from Andrew Pinski ---
This does get vectorized with SVE on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95887
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95887
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 95887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88662
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #20)
> (In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #18)
> > What aspects of the psABI for bool do you say GCC does not respect?
>
> I meant in general. So I've filed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116651
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83819
Bug 83819 depends on bug 93265, which changed state.
Bug 93265 Summary: memcmp comparisons of structs wrapping a primitive type not
as compact/efficient as direct comparisons of the underlying primitive type
under -Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93265
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103647
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116651
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
commit r16-3470-gbfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
commit r16-3470-gbfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103647
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
commit r16-3470-gbfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93265
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
commit r16-3470-gbfa70ddb650ec91c2511d351b2b3c3f78dfad6d4
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119808
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Fixed for 14.3 as well, though the #c7 case still needs to be analyzed.
I can't reproduce testcase in comment #7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-08-30
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121718
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao Liu ---
Let's revert it first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-08-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114445
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch for this PR (and PR119857) that moves the creation to the host:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-August/693753.html
Note it does not (yet?) address the issue of having multiple images
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99951
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101822
Bug 101822 depends on bug 7, which changed state.
Bug 7 Summary: Missed optimisation with -Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Seems to be fixed on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121208
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izaberina at gmail dot com
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117909
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114611
--- Comment #8 from Walter Spector ---
I built a snapshot of gfortran today. Tested it, and all looks great. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121725
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
elfutils, python, mpfr, ocaml are fine. FF will take a bit longer as the
machine which hit it is slower (laptop, not desktop), but I wouldn't wait on
that once you're happy.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Confirmed as at least SRA moving over to the wrong aliasing set for the new
> store to the variable.
Right, that is why I asked Michal to assign the bug to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121709
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121629
Bug 121629 depends on bug 121709, which changed state.
Bug 121709 Summary: [16 regression] Failed bootstrap in m2
(m2/gm2-lang.cc:547:39: error: ‘PREFIX_INCLUDE_DIR’ was not declared in this
scope)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121709
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ab3bbadefb7f61086dec3da982059779f7cff51
commit r16-3467-g8ab3bbadefb7f61086dec3da982059779f7cff51
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121629
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ab3bbadefb7f61086dec3da982059779f7cff51
commit r16-3467-g8ab3bbadefb7f61086dec3da982059779f7cff51
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #16 from Mark Harmstone ---
I've sent a fix for this to the list:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20250829203610.12218-1-m...@harmstone.com/T/#u
As Eric said, the problem is essentially that CodeView isn't designed to
accom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121709
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62242|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #18 from Mark Harmstone ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #17)
> > As Eric said, the problem is essentially that CodeView isn't designed to
> > accommodate Ada's type system.
>
> Yes, but STABS was in the same case so spec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ---
> As Eric said, the problem is essentially that CodeView isn't designed to
> accommodate Ada's type system.
Yes, but STABS was in the same case so special encodings were devised to work
around its limitati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121725
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Thanks. I'll try it now on Python and FF too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121725
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Here's another testcase from elfutils. It has two files, I haven't tried to
> condense it into one to keep it more realistic, but I can if needed.
> $ gcc -O3 -flto dwarf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
With thashx4 being inlined, SRA does the replacement but does the right thing
since the int64_t loads become BIT_FIELD_REF .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> SRA does not reload ctx after thashx4.part.0.constprop either:
> ```
> _2 = MEM [(char * {ref-all})sk_5(D)];
> ctx_14 = _2;
> MEM[(struct *)&ctx] = ctx_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121725
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121718
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-08-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121698
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62241|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121725
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Here's another testcase from elfutils. It has two files, I haven't tried to
condense it into one to keep it more realistic, but I can if needed.
```
$ cat dwarf_error.i
static __thread int global_error;
int
dwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
The other thing to note is SRA is doing something wrong after the call to
thashx4.part.0.constprop.
```
MEM [(char * {ref-all})&ctx] = _2;
thashx4.part.0.constprop (sg_7(D), sg_7(D), sg_7(D), sg_7(D),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121728
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> Adding 'implicit none' leads to proper rejection of the testcase:
>
> pr121728.f90:8:12:
>
> 8 | type(t(n)) :: z
> |1
> Fatal Err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121728
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-08-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
SRA changes it:
```
Candidate (43984): ctx
Allowed ADDR_EXPR of ctx because of thashx4.part.0.constprop (sg_7(D), sg_7(D),
sg_7(D), sg_7(D), &ctx.pub_seed[0]);
Created a replacement for ctx offset: 0, size:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
There might be a bug but it was exposed by the DSE patch though.
We start out with:
MEM [(char * {ref-all})&ctx] = _2;
But by the time we get to DSE we have:
MEM[(struct *)&ctx] = _2;
Which changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121728
Bug ID: 121728
Summary: [PDT] Testcase gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90 ICEs under
valgrind
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121690
--- Comment #12 from Torbjorn SVENSSON ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> So here is what I think happens. the \n happens at the end of the buffer so
> it is changed into \n\r into the buffer and then the next character from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121709
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Thanks Gaius, I'll give that a whack now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121039
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e98b37f32f8bff72885904fc66ea7ec8fefec58
commit r16-3465-g9e98b37f32f8bff72885904fc66ea7ec8fefec58
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93330
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121709
--- Comment #8 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 62242
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62242&action=edit
Proposed fix for default include directories using cpp_include_defaults
Many thanks for the bug report and buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121698
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62239|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
So I think the problem is you access via uint64_t and then via the struct which
causes the undefined behavior.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] ICE: |[15 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121548
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25bbc0f20a25a1db59baaf36d119ce274968747f
commit r16-3463-g25bbc0f20a25a1db59baaf36d119ce274968747f
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Fri Aug 29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121727
Bug ID: 121727
Summary: Missed optimization passing character actual to
shorter dummy with value attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121727
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Michal Jireš from comment #0)
> The issue is with uint8_t pub_seed[SPX_N];
> The `memcpy(ctx.pub_seed, ...)` is incorrectly being optimized away,
> followed by
> `pub_seed` being casted and read via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 99% sure this is still not allowed. Let me look into this when I get
home.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.3
Summary|Possible miscompila
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121726
Bug ID: 121726
Summary: Possible miscompilation with strict aliasing,
uint8_t[] to uint64_t*
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93330
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18e49f19f5907de8d28cd33a8789946a3f5092ce
commit r16-3462-g18e49f19f5907de8d28cd33a8789946a3f5092ce
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121698
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121720
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121720
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121720
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92413
Artyom Kolpakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ddvamp007 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121725
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
.. and -mtls-dialect=gnu2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi!
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Wow, and this time it's even combine coming into play!
But it is just something that happens during the instruction combiner pass,
not anything to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121725
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
ludes
--with-gxx-libcxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/v1 --enable-linker-build-id
--with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250829 (experimental)
79e0dbf1c44fc23d870b8a08ad3562454efea015 (Gentoo Harde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121724
Bug ID: 121724
Summary: Bad file data error on modules with nested namespace
that does not match with global module fragment
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121723
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/16/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121723
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62237
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62237&action=edit
c-attribs.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121723
Bug ID: 121723
Summary: 'non-delegitimized UNSPEC UNSPEC_GOTPCREL (2) found in
variable location' with -march=tigerlake
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121720
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Possibly caused by r15-3986-g3e1bd6470e4deb but I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121719
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121709
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Gaius Mulle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121722
Bug ID: 121722
Summary: wrong code generated with -O1 for a program using
_BitInt()
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121709
--- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulley ---
Many thanks for the references to cppdefault and sysroot, I'll generate a
patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121721
Bug ID: 121721
Summary: tiny wideset example takes too much time to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121719
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121720
Bug ID: 121720
Summary: [13.4 / 14.3 / 15 / 16 Regression] std::min_element is
not optimized at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121718
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121096
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
